Solving CVRP with ACO
Minimizing Travel Cost for Complex Delivery Problems
This scenario involves the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem,
solved using the meta-heuristics algorithm Ant Colony Optimization. Basically, VRP is a network consisting of a number of nodes
(sometimes called cities) and arcs connecting one to all others along with the corresponding costs.
Mostly, the aim is to minimize the cost in visiting each customer once and only once. The term
"capacitated" is added due to some capacity constraints on the vehicles (vcap).
Enter the problem. Some company wants to deliver loads to a number of customers. In this case, we
have 24 nodes based on the location of Germany's train stations (don't ask why). The delivery
always starts from and ends at the depot, visiting a list of customers in other cities. And then
a number of questions arise:
- How do we minimize the travel cost in terms of distance?
- How many trucks are required?
- Which cities are visited by the truck #1, #2. etc.?
- depot: [0..23], def = 0
- vcap: [200..400], def = 400
There is a way to set all the demands, but I don't think you are ready for that. 😉
VCAP: 400 vol.
ACTIVE: 22 customers
- Berlin Hbf (30 vol.)
- Düsseldorf Hbf (65 vol.)
- Frankfurt Hbf (45 vol.)
- Hannover Hbf (30 vol.)
- Aachen Hbf (95 vol.)
- Stuttgart Hbf (40 vol.)
- Dresden Hbf (75 vol.)
- München Hbf (25 vol.)
- Bremen Hbf (20 vol.)
- Leipzig Hbf (30 vol.)
- Dortmund Hbf (100 vol.)
- Nürnberg Hbf (100 vol.)
- Karlsruhe Hbf (50 vol.)
- Ulm Hbf (55 vol.)
- Köln Hbf (30 vol.)
- Mannheim Hbf (30 vol.)
- Kiel Hbf (25 vol.)
- Mainz Hbf (100 vol.)
- Würzburg Hbf (75 vol.)
- Saarbrücken Hbf (40 vol.)
- Osnabrück Hbf (80 vol.)
- Freiburg Hbf (100 vol.)
Tour 1
COST: 1684.362 km
LOAD: 390 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 100 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 80 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 30 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 20 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 25 vol.
- Berlin Hbf | 30 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 75 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 30 vol.
Tour 2
COST: 1150.363 km
LOAD: 375 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 75 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 100 vol.
- München Hbf | 25 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 55 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 40 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 50 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 30 vol.
Tour 3
COST: 1310.743 km
LOAD: 380 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 95 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 40 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 100 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 45 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 100 vol.
Tour 4
COST: 502.499 km
LOAD: 95 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 30 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 65 vol.
LOAD: 390 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 100 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 80 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 30 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 20 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 25 vol.
- Berlin Hbf | 30 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 75 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 30 vol.
LOAD: 375 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 75 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 100 vol.
- München Hbf | 25 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 55 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 40 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 50 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 30 vol.
LOAD: 380 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 95 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 40 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 100 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 45 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 100 vol.
LOAD: 95 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 30 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 65 vol.
#generations: 10 for global, 5 for local
#ants: 5 times #active_customers
ACO
Rel. importance of pheromones α = 1.0
Rel. importance of visibility β = 10.0
Trail persistance ρ = 0.5
Pheromone intensity Q = 10
See this wikipedia page to learn more.
NETWORK Depo: [0] Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | Number of cities: 24 | Total loads: 1240 vol. | Vehicle capacity: 400 vol. Loads: [0, 30, 65, 45, 30, 95, 40, 75, 0, 25, 20, 30, 100, 100, 50, 55, 30, 30, 25, 100, 75, 40, 80, 100] ITERATION Generation: #1 Best cost: 6196.487 | Path: [0, 1, 7, 11, 13, 20, 3, 17, 0, 22, 10, 4, 12, 2, 16, 21, 9, 0, 19, 14, 6, 15, 23, 18, 0, 5, 0] Best cost: 5858.083 | Path: [0, 2, 16, 5, 12, 22, 10, 0, 4, 11, 7, 1, 18, 19, 3, 17, 9, 0, 20, 13, 15, 6, 14, 21, 0, 23, 0] Best cost: 5617.060 | Path: [0, 5, 16, 2, 12, 22, 10, 0, 4, 18, 1, 7, 11, 13, 20, 17, 0, 3, 19, 6, 14, 23, 15, 0, 21, 9, 0] Best cost: 5558.194 | Path: [0, 12, 2, 16, 5, 19, 0, 4, 10, 22, 20, 13, 9, 15, 0, 3, 17, 14, 6, 23, 21, 11, 1, 18, 0, 7, 0] Best cost: 4976.189 | Path: [0, 16, 2, 12, 22, 4, 10, 18, 1, 0, 20, 13, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 0, 3, 19, 21, 23, 5, 0, 11, 7, 0] Generation: #2 Best cost: 4907.678 | Path: [0, 7, 11, 1, 18, 10, 22, 12, 16, 0, 20, 13, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 0, 4, 2, 5, 21, 23, 3, 0, 19, 0] Generation: #3 Best cost: 4817.051 | Path: [0, 11, 7, 1, 18, 10, 22, 12, 16, 0, 20, 13, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 0, 4, 2, 5, 21, 23, 3, 0, 19, 0] Best cost: 4790.740 | Path: [0, 11, 7, 1, 18, 10, 4, 22, 12, 0, 20, 13, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 0, 19, 3, 21, 23, 5, 0, 2, 16, 0] Generation: #4 Best cost: 4790.431 | Path: [0, 11, 7, 1, 18, 10, 4, 22, 12, 0, 20, 13, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 0, 19, 3, 21, 23, 5, 0, 16, 2, 0] Best cost: 4730.728 | Path: [0, 11, 7, 1, 18, 10, 4, 22, 12, 0, 20, 13, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 0, 3, 19, 21, 23, 5, 0, 2, 16, 0] OPTIMIZING each tour... Current: [[0, 11, 7, 1, 18, 10, 4, 22, 12, 0], [0, 20, 13, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 0], [0, 3, 19, 21, 23, 5, 0], [0, 2, 16, 0]] [1] Cost: 1695.107 to 1684.362 | Optimized: [0, 12, 22, 4, 10, 18, 1, 7, 11, 0] [3] Cost: 1382.450 to 1310.743 | Optimized: [0, 5, 21, 23, 3, 19, 0] [4] Cost: 502.808 to 502.499 | Optimized: [0, 16, 2, 0] ACO RESULTS [1/390 vol./1684.362 km] Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe -> Dortmund Hbf -> Osnabrück Hbf -> Hannover Hbf -> Bremen Hbf -> Kiel Hbf -> Berlin Hbf -> Dresden Hbf -> Leipzig Hbf --> Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe [2/375 vol./1150.363 km] Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe -> Würzburg Hbf -> Nürnberg Hbf -> München Hbf -> Ulm Hbf -> Stuttgart Hbf -> Karlsruhe Hbf -> Mannheim Hbf --> Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe [3/380 vol./1310.743 km] Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe -> Aachen Hbf -> Saarbrücken Hbf -> Freiburg Hbf -> Frankfurt Hbf -> Mainz Hbf --> Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe [4/ 95 vol./ 502.499 km] Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe -> Köln Hbf -> Düsseldorf Hbf --> Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe OPTIMIZATION RESULT: 4 tours | 4647.967 km.