Solving CVRP with ACO
Minimizing Travel Cost for Complex Delivery Problems
This scenario involves the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem,
solved using the meta-heuristics algorithm Ant Colony Optimization. Basically, VRP is a network consisting of a number of nodes
(sometimes called cities) and arcs connecting one to all others along with the corresponding costs.
Mostly, the aim is to minimize the cost in visiting each customer once and only once. The term
"capacitated" is added due to some capacity constraints on the vehicles (vcap).
Enter the problem. Some company wants to deliver loads to a number of customers. In this case, we
have 24 nodes based on the location of Germany's train stations (don't ask why). The delivery
always starts from and ends at the depot, visiting a list of customers in other cities. And then
a number of questions arise:
- How do we minimize the travel cost in terms of distance?
- How many trucks are required?
- Which cities are visited by the truck #1, #2. etc.?
- depot: [0..23], def = 0
- vcap: [200..400], def = 400
There is a way to set all the demands, but I don't think you are ready for that. 😉
VCAP: 300 vol.
ACTIVE: 22 customers
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe (30 vol.)
- Düsseldorf Hbf (60 vol.)
- Frankfurt Hbf (25 vol.)
- Hannover Hbf (85 vol.)
- Aachen Hbf (70 vol.)
- Stuttgart Hbf (100 vol.)
- Dresden Hbf (85 vol.)
- Hamburg Hbf (35 vol.)
- München Hbf (45 vol.)
- Bremen Hbf (70 vol.)
- Leipzig Hbf (60 vol.)
- Dortmund Hbf (35 vol.)
- Nürnberg Hbf (75 vol.)
- Ulm Hbf (55 vol.)
- Köln Hbf (55 vol.)
- Mannheim Hbf (80 vol.)
- Kiel Hbf (40 vol.)
- Mainz Hbf (40 vol.)
- Würzburg Hbf (45 vol.)
- Saarbrücken Hbf (35 vol.)
- Osnabrück Hbf (50 vol.)
- Freiburg Hbf (35 vol.)
Tour 1
COST: 2070.362 km
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 55 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 40 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 25 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 80 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 35 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 35 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 30 vol.
Tour 2
COST: 1082.275 km
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 85 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 60 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 85 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 70 vol.
Tour 3
COST: 1582.403 km
LOAD: 290 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 35 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 60 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 70 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 50 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 35 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 40 vol.
Tour 4
COST: 1445.778 km
LOAD: 245 vol.
- München Hbf | 45 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 55 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 100 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 45 vol.
Tour 5
COST: 869.684 km
LOAD: 75 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 75 vol.
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 55 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 40 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 25 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 80 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 35 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 35 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 30 vol.
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 85 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 60 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 85 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 70 vol.
LOAD: 290 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 35 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 60 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 70 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 50 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 35 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 40 vol.
LOAD: 245 vol.
- München Hbf | 45 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 55 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 100 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 45 vol.
LOAD: 75 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 75 vol.
#generations: 10 for global, 5 for local
#ants: 5 times #active_customers
ACO
Rel. importance of pheromones α = 1.0
Rel. importance of visibility β = 10.0
Trail persistance ρ = 0.5
Pheromone intensity Q = 10
See this wikipedia page to learn more.
NETWORK Depo: [1] Berlin Hbf | Number of cities: 24 | Total loads: 1210 vol. | Vehicle capacity: 300 vol. Loads: [30, 0, 60, 25, 85, 70, 100, 85, 35, 45, 70, 60, 35, 75, 0, 55, 55, 80, 40, 40, 45, 35, 50, 35] ITERATION Generation: #1 Best cost: 8698.023 | Path: [1, 0, 22, 4, 10, 8, 3, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 21, 1, 18, 12, 2, 16, 5, 19, 1, 9, 15, 6, 17, 1, 23, 1] Best cost: 8232.074 | Path: [1, 2, 16, 5, 12, 22, 0, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 3, 1, 4, 10, 8, 18, 19, 1, 15, 6, 17, 21, 1, 9, 23, 1] Best cost: 8099.154 | Path: [1, 3, 19, 17, 21, 23, 9, 0, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 12, 1, 8, 18, 4, 10, 22, 1, 15, 6, 16, 2, 1, 5, 1] Best cost: 7622.647 | Path: [1, 4, 10, 8, 18, 22, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 3, 1, 0, 12, 2, 16, 5, 19, 1, 9, 15, 6, 17, 1, 23, 21, 1] Best cost: 7622.242 | Path: [1, 7, 11, 16, 2, 12, 1, 13, 20, 6, 15, 3, 1, 8, 18, 10, 4, 22, 1, 0, 19, 17, 21, 23, 9, 1, 5, 1] Best cost: 7263.856 | Path: [1, 15, 6, 17, 3, 19, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 0, 1, 18, 8, 10, 4, 22, 1, 12, 2, 16, 5, 21, 23, 1, 9, 1] Best cost: 7242.689 | Path: [1, 7, 11, 17, 3, 19, 1, 4, 8, 18, 22, 10, 1, 12, 2, 16, 5, 21, 23, 1, 0, 20, 6, 15, 9, 1, 13, 1] Best cost: 7242.096 | Path: [1, 17, 19, 3, 2, 16, 12, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 0, 1, 4, 22, 10, 8, 18, 1, 15, 6, 23, 21, 5, 1, 9, 1] Best cost: 7233.659 | Path: [1, 15, 6, 17, 19, 3, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 0, 1, 18, 8, 10, 4, 22, 1, 12, 2, 16, 5, 21, 23, 1, 9, 1] Generation: #2 Best cost: 7093.309 | Path: [1, 3, 19, 17, 21, 23, 16, 0, 1, 7, 11, 4, 10, 1, 8, 18, 22, 12, 2, 5, 1, 9, 15, 6, 20, 1, 13, 1] OPTIMIZING each tour... Current: [[1, 3, 19, 17, 21, 23, 16, 0, 1], [1, 7, 11, 4, 10, 1], [1, 8, 18, 22, 12, 2, 5, 1], [1, 9, 15, 6, 20, 1], [1, 13, 1]] [1] Cost: 2081.471 to 2070.362 | Optimized: [1, 16, 19, 3, 17, 21, 23, 0, 1] [3] Cost: 1614.101 to 1582.403 | Optimized: [1, 12, 2, 5, 22, 8, 18, 1] ACO RESULTS [1/300 vol./2070.362 km] Berlin Hbf -> Köln Hbf -> Mainz Hbf -> Frankfurt Hbf -> Mannheim Hbf -> Saarbrücken Hbf -> Freiburg Hbf -> Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe --> Berlin Hbf [2/300 vol./1082.275 km] Berlin Hbf -> Dresden Hbf -> Leipzig Hbf -> Hannover Hbf -> Bremen Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [3/290 vol./1582.403 km] Berlin Hbf -> Dortmund Hbf -> Düsseldorf Hbf -> Aachen Hbf -> Osnabrück Hbf -> Hamburg Hbf -> Kiel Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [4/245 vol./1445.778 km] Berlin Hbf -> München Hbf -> Ulm Hbf -> Stuttgart Hbf -> Würzburg Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [5/ 75 vol./ 869.684 km] Berlin Hbf -> Nürnberg Hbf --> Berlin Hbf OPTIMIZATION RESULT: 5 tours | 7050.502 km.