Solving CVRP with ACO
Minimizing Travel Cost for Complex Delivery Problems
This scenario involves the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem,
solved using the meta-heuristics algorithm Ant Colony Optimization. Basically, VRP is a network consisting of a number of nodes
(sometimes called cities) and arcs connecting one to all others along with the corresponding costs.
Mostly, the aim is to minimize the cost in visiting each customer once and only once. The term
"capacitated" is added due to some capacity constraints on the vehicles (vcap).
Enter the problem. Some company wants to deliver loads to a number of customers. In this case, we
have 24 nodes based on the location of Germany's train stations (don't ask why). The delivery
always starts from and ends at the depot, visiting a list of customers in other cities. And then
a number of questions arise:
- How do we minimize the travel cost in terms of distance?
- How many trucks are required?
- Which cities are visited by the truck #1, #2. etc.?
- depot: [0..23], def = 0
- vcap: [200..400], def = 400
There is a way to set all the demands, but I don't think you are ready for that. 😉
VCAP: 300 vol.
ACTIVE: 21 customers
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe (45 vol.)
- Düsseldorf Hbf (40 vol.)
- Frankfurt Hbf (65 vol.)
- Hannover Hbf (55 vol.)
- Aachen Hbf (85 vol.)
- Stuttgart Hbf (55 vol.)
- Dresden Hbf (85 vol.)
- Hamburg Hbf (100 vol.)
- München Hbf (45 vol.)
- Bremen Hbf (70 vol.)
- Leipzig Hbf (90 vol.)
- Dortmund Hbf (55 vol.)
- Nürnberg Hbf (25 vol.)
- Karlsruhe Hbf (60 vol.)
- Ulm Hbf (40 vol.)
- Köln Hbf (90 vol.)
- Mannheim Hbf (60 vol.)
- Mainz Hbf (55 vol.)
- Würzburg Hbf (100 vol.)
- Saarbrücken Hbf (25 vol.)
- Osnabrück Hbf (35 vol.)
Tour 1
COST: 1825.523 km
LOAD: 285 vol.
- München Hbf | 45 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 40 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 55 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 60 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 60 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 25 vol.
Tour 2
COST: 1187.501 km
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 100 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 25 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 90 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 85 vol.
Tour 3
COST: 1261.592 km
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 55 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 40 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 35 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 70 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 100 vol.
Tour 4
COST: 1474.716 km
LOAD: 295 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 65 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 55 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 85 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 90 vol.
Tour 5
COST: 856.282 km
LOAD: 100 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 55 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 45 vol.
LOAD: 285 vol.
- München Hbf | 45 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 40 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 55 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 60 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 60 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 25 vol.
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 100 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 25 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 90 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 85 vol.
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 55 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 40 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 35 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 70 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 100 vol.
LOAD: 295 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 65 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 55 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 85 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 90 vol.
LOAD: 100 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 55 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 45 vol.
#generations: 10 for global, 5 for local
#ants: 5 times #active_customers
ACO
Rel. importance of pheromones α = 1.0
Rel. importance of visibility β = 10.0
Trail persistance ρ = 0.5
Pheromone intensity Q = 10
See this wikipedia page to learn more.
NETWORK Depo: [1] Berlin Hbf | Number of cities: 24 | Total loads: 1280 vol. | Vehicle capacity: 300 vol. Loads: [45, 0, 40, 65, 55, 85, 55, 85, 100, 45, 70, 90, 55, 25, 60, 40, 90, 60, 0, 55, 100, 25, 35, 0] ITERATION Generation: #1 Best cost: 7490.870 | Path: [1, 0, 22, 10, 4, 12, 2, 1, 11, 7, 20, 13, 1, 8, 5, 16, 21, 1, 3, 19, 17, 14, 6, 1, 9, 15, 1] Best cost: 7072.226 | Path: [1, 7, 11, 4, 10, 1, 8, 22, 12, 2, 17, 1, 0, 19, 3, 20, 13, 1, 9, 15, 6, 14, 21, 1, 5, 16, 1] Best cost: 7008.088 | Path: [1, 17, 14, 6, 15, 9, 13, 1, 11, 7, 12, 2, 21, 1, 4, 22, 10, 8, 1, 0, 3, 19, 20, 1, 5, 16, 1] Best cost: 6965.091 | Path: [1, 8, 10, 4, 22, 2, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 21, 1, 0, 12, 16, 5, 1, 19, 3, 1] Best cost: 6938.869 | Path: [1, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 21, 1, 7, 11, 13, 20, 1, 8, 10, 4, 22, 2, 1, 0, 12, 16, 5, 1, 19, 3, 1] Generation: #2 Best cost: 6890.376 | Path: [1, 21, 17, 14, 6, 15, 9, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1, 8, 10, 22, 12, 2, 1, 4, 0, 3, 19, 1, 16, 5, 1] Best cost: 6875.364 | Path: [1, 21, 14, 17, 19, 3, 13, 1, 7, 11, 4, 10, 1, 8, 22, 12, 2, 0, 1, 20, 6, 15, 9, 1, 16, 5, 1] Best cost: 6867.285 | Path: [1, 13, 20, 3, 19, 21, 1, 7, 11, 4, 10, 1, 8, 22, 12, 2, 0, 1, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 1, 16, 5, 1] Best cost: 6789.758 | Path: [1, 21, 14, 17, 19, 3, 13, 1, 7, 11, 0, 4, 1, 8, 10, 22, 12, 2, 1, 20, 6, 15, 9, 1, 16, 5, 1] Generation: #3 Best cost: 6700.103 | Path: [1, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 21, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1, 8, 10, 22, 12, 2, 1, 16, 5, 3, 19, 1, 4, 0, 1] OPTIMIZING each tour... Current: [[1, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 21, 1], [1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1], [1, 8, 10, 22, 12, 2, 1], [1, 16, 5, 3, 19, 1], [1, 4, 0, 1]] [2] Cost: 1216.319 to 1187.501 | Optimized: [1, 20, 13, 11, 7, 1] [3] Cost: 1280.860 to 1261.592 | Optimized: [1, 12, 2, 22, 10, 8, 1] [4] Cost: 1521.119 to 1474.716 | Optimized: [1, 3, 19, 5, 16, 1] ACO RESULTS [1/285 vol./1825.523 km] Berlin Hbf -> München Hbf -> Ulm Hbf -> Stuttgart Hbf -> Karlsruhe Hbf -> Mannheim Hbf -> Saarbrücken Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [2/300 vol./1187.501 km] Berlin Hbf -> Würzburg Hbf -> Nürnberg Hbf -> Leipzig Hbf -> Dresden Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [3/300 vol./1261.592 km] Berlin Hbf -> Dortmund Hbf -> Düsseldorf Hbf -> Osnabrück Hbf -> Bremen Hbf -> Hamburg Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [4/295 vol./1474.716 km] Berlin Hbf -> Frankfurt Hbf -> Mainz Hbf -> Aachen Hbf -> Köln Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [5/100 vol./ 856.282 km] Berlin Hbf -> Hannover Hbf -> Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe --> Berlin Hbf OPTIMIZATION RESULT: 5 tours | 6605.614 km.