Solving CVRP with ACO
Minimizing Travel Cost for Complex Delivery Problems
This scenario involves the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem,
solved using the meta-heuristics algorithm Ant Colony Optimization. Basically, VRP is a network consisting of a number of nodes
(sometimes called cities) and arcs connecting one to all others along with the corresponding costs.
Mostly, the aim is to minimize the cost in visiting each customer once and only once. The term
"capacitated" is added due to some capacity constraints on the vehicles (vcap).
Enter the problem. Some company wants to deliver loads to a number of customers. In this case, we
have 24 nodes based on the location of Germany's train stations (don't ask why). The delivery
always starts from and ends at the depot, visiting a list of customers in other cities. And then
a number of questions arise:
- How do we minimize the travel cost in terms of distance?
- How many trucks are required?
- Which cities are visited by the truck #1, #2. etc.?
- depot: [0..23], def = 0
- vcap: [200..400], def = 400
There is a way to set all the demands, but I don't think you are ready for that. 😉
VCAP: 300 vol.
ACTIVE: 22 customers
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe (55 vol.)
- Düsseldorf Hbf (80 vol.)
- Frankfurt Hbf (65 vol.)
- Hannover Hbf (70 vol.)
- Aachen Hbf (95 vol.)
- Stuttgart Hbf (80 vol.)
- Dresden Hbf (25 vol.)
- Hamburg Hbf (80 vol.)
- München Hbf (50 vol.)
- Bremen Hbf (100 vol.)
- Leipzig Hbf (70 vol.)
- Dortmund Hbf (80 vol.)
- Nürnberg Hbf (80 vol.)
- Karlsruhe Hbf (90 vol.)
- Ulm Hbf (25 vol.)
- Köln Hbf (70 vol.)
- Mannheim Hbf (85 vol.)
- Kiel Hbf (80 vol.)
- Mainz Hbf (40 vol.)
- Saarbrücken Hbf (35 vol.)
- Osnabrück Hbf (80 vol.)
- Freiburg Hbf (80 vol.)
Tour 1
COST: 1536.675 km
LOAD: 280 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 85 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 35 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 40 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 65 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 55 vol.
Tour 2
COST: 1527.486 km
LOAD: 250 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 25 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 70 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 80 vol.
- München Hbf | 50 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 25 vol.
Tour 3
COST: 805.867 km
LOAD: 250 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 70 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 100 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 80 vol.
Tour 4
COST: 1279.576 km
LOAD: 240 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 80 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 80 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 80 vol.
Tour 5
COST: 1303.404 km
LOAD: 245 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 95 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 70 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 80 vol.
Tour 6
COST: 1644.634 km
LOAD: 250 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 90 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 80 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 80 vol.
LOAD: 280 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 85 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 35 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 40 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 65 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 55 vol.
LOAD: 250 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 25 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 70 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 80 vol.
- München Hbf | 50 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 25 vol.
LOAD: 250 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 70 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 100 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 80 vol.
LOAD: 240 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 80 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 80 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 80 vol.
LOAD: 245 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 95 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 70 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 80 vol.
LOAD: 250 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 90 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 80 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 80 vol.
#generations: 10 for global, 5 for local
#ants: 5 times #active_customers
ACO
Rel. importance of pheromones α = 1.0
Rel. importance of visibility β = 10.0
Trail persistance ρ = 0.5
Pheromone intensity Q = 10
See this wikipedia page to learn more.
NETWORK Depo: [1] Berlin Hbf | Number of cities: 24 | Total loads: 1515 vol. | Vehicle capacity: 300 vol. Loads: [55, 0, 80, 65, 70, 95, 80, 25, 80, 50, 100, 70, 80, 80, 90, 25, 70, 85, 80, 40, 0, 35, 80, 80] ITERATION Generation: #1 Best cost: 9097.492 | Path: [1, 0, 22, 4, 8, 1, 11, 7, 13, 9, 15, 19, 1, 18, 10, 12, 21, 1, 3, 17, 14, 1, 2, 16, 5, 1, 6, 23, 1] Best cost: 9016.193 | Path: [1, 6, 14, 17, 19, 1, 11, 7, 13, 9, 15, 21, 1, 4, 10, 22, 1, 8, 18, 12, 0, 1, 3, 16, 2, 23, 1, 5, 1] Best cost: 8635.809 | Path: [1, 14, 17, 19, 3, 1, 11, 7, 4, 22, 0, 1, 12, 2, 16, 21, 15, 1, 18, 8, 10, 1, 13, 9, 6, 23, 1, 5, 1] Best cost: 8527.244 | Path: [1, 2, 16, 5, 19, 1, 11, 7, 13, 9, 15, 21, 1, 8, 18, 10, 1, 4, 22, 12, 0, 1, 3, 17, 14, 1, 6, 23, 1] Best cost: 8491.378 | Path: [1, 3, 19, 17, 14, 1, 11, 7, 13, 9, 15, 21, 1, 4, 10, 8, 1, 18, 22, 12, 0, 1, 16, 2, 5, 1, 6, 23, 1] Best cost: 8453.175 | Path: [1, 9, 15, 6, 14, 21, 1, 7, 11, 13, 3, 19, 1, 4, 10, 22, 1, 8, 18, 12, 0, 1, 2, 16, 5, 1, 17, 23, 1] Best cost: 8308.137 | Path: [1, 18, 8, 10, 7, 1, 11, 4, 22, 12, 1, 13, 9, 15, 6, 3, 1, 0, 2, 16, 5, 1, 17, 14, 23, 21, 1, 19, 1] Generation: #2 Best cost: 8196.577 | Path: [1, 0, 3, 19, 17, 21, 1, 11, 7, 13, 9, 15, 1, 22, 12, 2, 1, 18, 8, 10, 1, 4, 16, 5, 1, 6, 14, 23, 1] Generation: #5 Best cost: 8176.131 | Path: [1, 0, 3, 19, 17, 21, 1, 11, 7, 13, 9, 15, 1, 4, 10, 8, 1, 18, 22, 12, 1, 2, 16, 5, 1, 6, 14, 23, 1] OPTIMIZING each tour... Current: [[1, 0, 3, 19, 17, 21, 1], [1, 11, 7, 13, 9, 15, 1], [1, 4, 10, 8, 1], [1, 18, 22, 12, 1], [1, 2, 16, 5, 1], [1, 6, 14, 23, 1]] [1] Cost: 1574.317 to 1536.675 | Optimized: [1, 17, 21, 19, 3, 0, 1] [2] Cost: 1553.708 to 1527.486 | Optimized: [1, 7, 11, 13, 9, 15, 1] [4] Cost: 1292.457 to 1279.576 | Optimized: [1, 12, 22, 18, 1] [5] Cost: 1304.255 to 1303.404 | Optimized: [1, 5, 16, 2, 1] [6] Cost: 1645.527 to 1644.634 | Optimized: [1, 14, 23, 6, 1] ACO RESULTS [1/280 vol./1536.675 km] Berlin Hbf -> Mannheim Hbf -> Saarbrücken Hbf -> Mainz Hbf -> Frankfurt Hbf -> Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe --> Berlin Hbf [2/250 vol./1527.486 km] Berlin Hbf -> Dresden Hbf -> Leipzig Hbf -> Nürnberg Hbf -> München Hbf -> Ulm Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [3/250 vol./ 805.867 km] Berlin Hbf -> Hannover Hbf -> Bremen Hbf -> Hamburg Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [4/240 vol./1279.576 km] Berlin Hbf -> Dortmund Hbf -> Osnabrück Hbf -> Kiel Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [5/245 vol./1303.404 km] Berlin Hbf -> Aachen Hbf -> Köln Hbf -> Düsseldorf Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [6/250 vol./1644.634 km] Berlin Hbf -> Karlsruhe Hbf -> Freiburg Hbf -> Stuttgart Hbf --> Berlin Hbf OPTIMIZATION RESULT: 6 tours | 8097.642 km.