Solving CVRP with ACO
Minimizing Travel Cost for Complex Delivery Problems
This scenario involves the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem,
solved using the meta-heuristics algorithm Ant Colony Optimization. Basically, VRP is a network consisting of a number of nodes
(sometimes called cities) and arcs connecting one to all others along with the corresponding costs.
Mostly, the aim is to minimize the cost in visiting each customer once and only once. The term
"capacitated" is added due to some capacity constraints on the vehicles (vcap).
Enter the problem. Some company wants to deliver loads to a number of customers. In this case, we
have 24 nodes based on the location of Germany's train stations (don't ask why). The delivery
always starts from and ends at the depot, visiting a list of customers in other cities. And then
a number of questions arise:
- How do we minimize the travel cost in terms of distance?
- How many trucks are required?
- Which cities are visited by the truck #1, #2. etc.?
- depot: [0..23], def = 0
- vcap: [200..400], def = 400
There is a way to set all the demands, but I don't think you are ready for that. 😉
VCAP: 300 vol.
ACTIVE: 22 customers
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe (85 vol.)
- Düsseldorf Hbf (25 vol.)
- Frankfurt Hbf (55 vol.)
- Hannover Hbf (65 vol.)
- Aachen Hbf (70 vol.)
- Stuttgart Hbf (25 vol.)
- Dresden Hbf (25 vol.)
- Hamburg Hbf (25 vol.)
- München Hbf (85 vol.)
- Bremen Hbf (35 vol.)
- Leipzig Hbf (90 vol.)
- Dortmund Hbf (70 vol.)
- Nürnberg Hbf (100 vol.)
- Karlsruhe Hbf (35 vol.)
- Ulm Hbf (50 vol.)
- Köln Hbf (30 vol.)
- Mannheim Hbf (85 vol.)
- Kiel Hbf (75 vol.)
- Mainz Hbf (60 vol.)
- Würzburg Hbf (80 vol.)
- Saarbrücken Hbf (80 vol.)
- Osnabrück Hbf (40 vol.)
Tour 1
COST: 1190.097 km
LOAD: 295 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 25 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 90 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 100 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 80 vol.
Tour 2
COST: 1263.139 km
LOAD: 285 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 85 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 65 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 35 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 25 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 75 vol.
Tour 3
COST: 1589.414 km
LOAD: 280 vol.
- München Hbf | 85 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 50 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 25 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 35 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 85 vol.
Tour 4
COST: 1641.924 km
LOAD: 295 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 55 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 60 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 80 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 70 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 30 vol.
Tour 5
COST: 1156.449 km
LOAD: 135 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 70 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 25 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 40 vol.
LOAD: 295 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 25 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 90 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 100 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 80 vol.
LOAD: 285 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 85 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 65 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 35 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 25 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 75 vol.
LOAD: 280 vol.
- München Hbf | 85 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 50 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 25 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 35 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 85 vol.
LOAD: 295 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 55 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 60 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 80 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 70 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 30 vol.
LOAD: 135 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 70 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 25 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 40 vol.
#generations: 10 for global, 5 for local
#ants: 5 times #active_customers
ACO
Rel. importance of pheromones α = 1.0
Rel. importance of visibility β = 10.0
Trail persistance ρ = 0.5
Pheromone intensity Q = 10
See this wikipedia page to learn more.
NETWORK Depo: [1] Berlin Hbf | Number of cities: 24 | Total loads: 1290 vol. | Vehicle capacity: 300 vol. Loads: [85, 0, 25, 55, 65, 70, 25, 25, 25, 85, 35, 90, 70, 100, 35, 50, 30, 85, 75, 60, 80, 80, 40, 0] ITERATION Generation: #1 Best cost: 8323.085 | Path: [1, 0, 22, 12, 2, 16, 14, 1, 7, 11, 13, 20, 1, 4, 10, 8, 18, 5, 6, 1, 9, 15, 3, 19, 1, 17, 21, 1] Best cost: 7835.862 | Path: [1, 2, 16, 5, 12, 22, 10, 8, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1, 4, 0, 19, 3, 14, 1, 18, 17, 6, 15, 1, 9, 21, 1] Best cost: 7506.476 | Path: [1, 3, 19, 17, 14, 6, 16, 1, 7, 11, 13, 20, 1, 8, 18, 10, 22, 12, 2, 1, 4, 0, 5, 21, 1, 9, 15, 1] Best cost: 7500.959 | Path: [1, 5, 2, 16, 12, 22, 10, 8, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1, 4, 0, 17, 14, 6, 1, 18, 19, 3, 21, 1, 15, 9, 1] Best cost: 7496.927 | Path: [1, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1, 4, 10, 8, 18, 22, 2, 16, 1, 0, 12, 5, 3, 1, 19, 21, 1] Best cost: 7252.688 | Path: [1, 18, 8, 10, 4, 0, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1, 22, 12, 2, 16, 5, 19, 1, 3, 17, 14, 6, 15, 1, 9, 21, 1] Best cost: 7249.387 | Path: [1, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1, 4, 22, 2, 16, 5, 12, 1, 8, 18, 10, 0, 3, 1, 19, 21, 1] Best cost: 7063.663 | Path: [1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1, 18, 8, 10, 4, 0, 1, 22, 12, 2, 16, 5, 3, 1, 17, 14, 6, 15, 9, 1, 19, 21, 1] Best cost: 7037.924 | Path: [1, 0, 4, 10, 8, 18, 1, 7, 11, 13, 20, 1, 22, 12, 2, 16, 5, 19, 1, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 1, 3, 21, 1] Best cost: 6973.070 | Path: [1, 17, 14, 6, 15, 9, 1, 7, 11, 4, 22, 10, 8, 1, 18, 5, 16, 2, 12, 1, 0, 3, 19, 21, 1, 13, 20, 1] Generation: #5 Best cost: 6894.497 | Path: [1, 8, 18, 10, 4, 0, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 1, 3, 19, 21, 5, 16, 1, 22, 2, 12, 1] Generation: #9 Best cost: 6886.506 | Path: [1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1, 8, 18, 10, 4, 0, 1, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 1, 3, 19, 21, 5, 16, 1, 12, 2, 22, 1] OPTIMIZING each tour... Current: [[1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1], [1, 8, 18, 10, 4, 0, 1], [1, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 1], [1, 3, 19, 21, 5, 16, 1], [1, 12, 2, 22, 1]] [1] Cost: 1216.319 to 1190.097 | Optimized: [1, 7, 11, 13, 20, 1] [2] Cost: 1282.400 to 1263.139 | Optimized: [1, 0, 4, 10, 8, 18, 1] ACO RESULTS [1/295 vol./1190.097 km] Berlin Hbf -> Dresden Hbf -> Leipzig Hbf -> Nürnberg Hbf -> Würzburg Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [2/285 vol./1263.139 km] Berlin Hbf -> Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe -> Hannover Hbf -> Bremen Hbf -> Hamburg Hbf -> Kiel Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [3/280 vol./1589.414 km] Berlin Hbf -> München Hbf -> Ulm Hbf -> Stuttgart Hbf -> Karlsruhe Hbf -> Mannheim Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [4/295 vol./1641.924 km] Berlin Hbf -> Frankfurt Hbf -> Mainz Hbf -> Saarbrücken Hbf -> Aachen Hbf -> Köln Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [5/135 vol./1156.449 km] Berlin Hbf -> Dortmund Hbf -> Düsseldorf Hbf -> Osnabrück Hbf --> Berlin Hbf OPTIMIZATION RESULT: 5 tours | 6841.023 km.