Solving CVRP with ACO
Minimizing Travel Cost for Complex Delivery Problems
This scenario involves the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem,
solved using the meta-heuristics algorithm Ant Colony Optimization. Basically, VRP is a network consisting of a number of nodes
(sometimes called cities) and arcs connecting one to all others along with the corresponding costs.
Mostly, the aim is to minimize the cost in visiting each customer once and only once. The term
"capacitated" is added due to some capacity constraints on the vehicles (vcap).
Enter the problem. Some company wants to deliver loads to a number of customers. In this case, we
have 24 nodes based on the location of Germany's train stations (don't ask why). The delivery
always starts from and ends at the depot, visiting a list of customers in other cities. And then
a number of questions arise:
- How do we minimize the travel cost in terms of distance?
- How many trucks are required?
- Which cities are visited by the truck #1, #2. etc.?
- depot: [0..23], def = 0
- vcap: [200..400], def = 400
There is a way to set all the demands, but I don't think you are ready for that. 😉
VCAP: 300 vol.
ACTIVE: 22 customers
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe (70 vol.)
- Düsseldorf Hbf (30 vol.)
- Frankfurt Hbf (95 vol.)
- Hannover Hbf (70 vol.)
- Aachen Hbf (95 vol.)
- Stuttgart Hbf (20 vol.)
- Dresden Hbf (50 vol.)
- Hamburg Hbf (45 vol.)
- Bremen Hbf (90 vol.)
- Leipzig Hbf (100 vol.)
- Dortmund Hbf (85 vol.)
- Nürnberg Hbf (25 vol.)
- Karlsruhe Hbf (95 vol.)
- Ulm Hbf (50 vol.)
- Köln Hbf (65 vol.)
- Mannheim Hbf (85 vol.)
- Kiel Hbf (85 vol.)
- Mainz Hbf (60 vol.)
- Würzburg Hbf (25 vol.)
- Saarbrücken Hbf (55 vol.)
- Osnabrück Hbf (30 vol.)
- Freiburg Hbf (80 vol.)
Tour 1
COST: 1534.551 km
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 25 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 50 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 20 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 95 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 85 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 25 vol.
Tour 2
COST: 1047.518 km
LOAD: 290 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 50 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 100 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 70 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 70 vol.
Tour 3
COST: 1308.428 km
LOAD: 275 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 85 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 30 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 65 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 95 vol.
Tour 4
COST: 1107.833 km
LOAD: 250 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 30 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 90 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 45 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 85 vol.
Tour 5
COST: 1747.015 km
LOAD: 290 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 95 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 60 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 55 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 80 vol.
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 25 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 50 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 20 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 95 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 85 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 25 vol.
LOAD: 290 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 50 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 100 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 70 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 70 vol.
LOAD: 275 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 85 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 30 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 65 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 95 vol.
LOAD: 250 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 30 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 90 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 45 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 85 vol.
LOAD: 290 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 95 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 60 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 55 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 80 vol.
#generations: 10 for global, 5 for local
#ants: 5 times #active_customers
ACO
Rel. importance of pheromones α = 1.0
Rel. importance of visibility β = 10.0
Trail persistance ρ = 0.5
Pheromone intensity Q = 10
See this wikipedia page to learn more.
NETWORK Depo: [1] Berlin Hbf | Number of cities: 24 | Total loads: 1405 vol. | Vehicle capacity: 300 vol. Loads: [70, 0, 30, 95, 70, 95, 20, 50, 45, 0, 90, 100, 85, 25, 95, 50, 65, 85, 85, 60, 25, 55, 30, 80] ITERATION Generation: #1 Best cost: 8126.542 | Path: [1, 0, 12, 2, 16, 22, 6, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 3, 1, 8, 18, 10, 4, 1, 14, 17, 19, 21, 1, 15, 23, 5, 1] Best cost: 7530.816 | Path: [1, 2, 16, 5, 12, 20, 1, 11, 7, 13, 15, 6, 21, 1, 8, 18, 10, 22, 1, 4, 0, 3, 19, 1, 17, 14, 23, 1] Best cost: 7447.956 | Path: [1, 6, 14, 17, 19, 20, 1, 7, 11, 13, 3, 2, 1, 8, 18, 10, 4, 1, 16, 5, 12, 22, 1, 0, 15, 23, 21, 1] Best cost: 7320.856 | Path: [1, 11, 7, 0, 16, 1, 18, 8, 10, 4, 1, 22, 12, 2, 5, 19, 1, 13, 20, 3, 17, 21, 1, 23, 14, 6, 15, 1] Best cost: 7304.626 | Path: [1, 20, 6, 14, 17, 19, 1, 7, 11, 0, 22, 2, 1, 18, 8, 10, 4, 1, 13, 15, 23, 21, 12, 1, 3, 16, 5, 1] Best cost: 7152.209 | Path: [1, 18, 8, 10, 4, 1, 7, 11, 6, 14, 20, 1, 0, 12, 2, 16, 22, 1, 13, 17, 19, 3, 1, 15, 23, 21, 5, 1] Best cost: 7132.811 | Path: [1, 4, 10, 8, 18, 1, 7, 11, 13, 20, 3, 1, 22, 2, 16, 5, 0, 1, 19, 17, 14, 6, 1, 12, 21, 23, 15, 1] Best cost: 7057.246 | Path: [1, 23, 14, 6, 15, 20, 13, 1, 7, 11, 0, 2, 22, 1, 4, 10, 8, 18, 1, 3, 19, 17, 21, 1, 12, 16, 5, 1] Generation: #4 Best cost: 6982.860 | Path: [1, 20, 13, 15, 6, 14, 17, 1, 11, 7, 0, 4, 1, 12, 2, 16, 5, 1, 8, 18, 10, 22, 1, 3, 19, 21, 23, 1] OPTIMIZING each tour... Current: [[1, 20, 13, 15, 6, 14, 17, 1], [1, 11, 7, 0, 4, 1], [1, 12, 2, 16, 5, 1], [1, 8, 18, 10, 22, 1], [1, 3, 19, 21, 23, 1]] [1] Cost: 1652.399 to 1534.551 | Optimized: [1, 13, 15, 6, 14, 17, 20, 1] [2] Cost: 1142.530 to 1047.518 | Optimized: [1, 7, 11, 0, 4, 1] [4] Cost: 1132.488 to 1107.833 | Optimized: [1, 22, 10, 8, 18, 1] ACO RESULTS [1/300 vol./1534.551 km] Berlin Hbf -> Nürnberg Hbf -> Ulm Hbf -> Stuttgart Hbf -> Karlsruhe Hbf -> Mannheim Hbf -> Würzburg Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [2/290 vol./1047.518 km] Berlin Hbf -> Dresden Hbf -> Leipzig Hbf -> Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe -> Hannover Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [3/275 vol./1308.428 km] Berlin Hbf -> Dortmund Hbf -> Düsseldorf Hbf -> Köln Hbf -> Aachen Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [4/250 vol./1107.833 km] Berlin Hbf -> Osnabrück Hbf -> Bremen Hbf -> Hamburg Hbf -> Kiel Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [5/290 vol./1747.015 km] Berlin Hbf -> Frankfurt Hbf -> Mainz Hbf -> Saarbrücken Hbf -> Freiburg Hbf --> Berlin Hbf OPTIMIZATION RESULT: 5 tours | 6745.345 km.