Solving CVRP with ACO
Minimizing Travel Cost for Complex Delivery Problems
This scenario involves the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem,
solved using the meta-heuristics algorithm Ant Colony Optimization. Basically, VRP is a network consisting of a number of nodes
(sometimes called cities) and arcs connecting one to all others along with the corresponding costs.
Mostly, the aim is to minimize the cost in visiting each customer once and only once. The term
"capacitated" is added due to some capacity constraints on the vehicles (vcap).
Enter the problem. Some company wants to deliver loads to a number of customers. In this case, we
have 24 nodes based on the location of Germany's train stations (don't ask why). The delivery
always starts from and ends at the depot, visiting a list of customers in other cities. And then
a number of questions arise:
- How do we minimize the travel cost in terms of distance?
- How many trucks are required?
- Which cities are visited by the truck #1, #2. etc.?
- depot: [0..23], def = 0
- vcap: [200..400], def = 400
There is a way to set all the demands, but I don't think you are ready for that. 😉
VCAP: 300 vol.
ACTIVE: 22 customers
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe (65 vol.)
- Düsseldorf Hbf (85 vol.)
- Frankfurt Hbf (80 vol.)
- Hannover Hbf (45 vol.)
- Aachen Hbf (70 vol.)
- Stuttgart Hbf (60 vol.)
- Dresden Hbf (70 vol.)
- Hamburg Hbf (50 vol.)
- München Hbf (100 vol.)
- Leipzig Hbf (100 vol.)
- Dortmund Hbf (20 vol.)
- Nürnberg Hbf (70 vol.)
- Karlsruhe Hbf (75 vol.)
- Ulm Hbf (25 vol.)
- Köln Hbf (80 vol.)
- Mannheim Hbf (90 vol.)
- Kiel Hbf (100 vol.)
- Mainz Hbf (40 vol.)
- Würzburg Hbf (60 vol.)
- Saarbrücken Hbf (25 vol.)
- Osnabrück Hbf (85 vol.)
- Freiburg Hbf (60 vol.)
Tour 1
COST: 1312.887 km
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 20 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 85 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 80 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 70 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 45 vol.
Tour 2
COST: 1187.501 km
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 60 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 70 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 100 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 70 vol.
Tour 3
COST: 1244.584 km
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 65 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 85 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 50 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 100 vol.
Tour 4
COST: 1410.52 km
LOAD: 285 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 40 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 90 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 75 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 80 vol.
Tour 5
COST: 1955.731 km
LOAD: 270 vol.
- München Hbf | 100 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 25 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 60 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 60 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 25 vol.
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 20 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 85 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 80 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 70 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 45 vol.
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 60 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 70 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 100 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 70 vol.
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 65 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 85 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 50 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 100 vol.
LOAD: 285 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 40 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 90 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 75 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 80 vol.
LOAD: 270 vol.
- München Hbf | 100 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 25 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 60 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 60 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 25 vol.
#generations: 10 for global, 5 for local
#ants: 5 times #active_customers
ACO
Rel. importance of pheromones α = 1.0
Rel. importance of visibility β = 10.0
Trail persistance ρ = 0.5
Pheromone intensity Q = 10
See this wikipedia page to learn more.
NETWORK Depo: [1] Berlin Hbf | Number of cities: 24 | Total loads: 1455 vol. | Vehicle capacity: 300 vol. Loads: [65, 0, 85, 80, 45, 70, 60, 70, 50, 100, 0, 100, 20, 70, 75, 25, 80, 90, 100, 40, 60, 25, 85, 60] ITERATION Generation: #1 Best cost: 7939.732 | Path: [1, 0, 4, 22, 12, 2, 1, 11, 7, 20, 13, 1, 8, 18, 5, 16, 1, 19, 3, 17, 14, 1, 6, 15, 9, 23, 21, 1] Best cost: 7220.924 | Path: [1, 5, 2, 16, 12, 4, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1, 8, 18, 22, 0, 1, 19, 3, 17, 14, 1, 9, 15, 6, 23, 21, 1] Best cost: 7220.085 | Path: [1, 5, 2, 16, 12, 4, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1, 8, 18, 22, 0, 1, 9, 15, 6, 14, 19, 1, 3, 17, 21, 23, 1] Best cost: 7184.579 | Path: [1, 5, 16, 2, 12, 4, 1, 11, 7, 20, 13, 1, 18, 8, 22, 0, 1, 9, 15, 6, 14, 19, 1, 3, 17, 21, 23, 1] Generation: #2 Best cost: 7176.019 | Path: [1, 2, 16, 5, 12, 4, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1, 8, 18, 22, 0, 1, 3, 19, 17, 14, 1, 9, 15, 6, 23, 21, 1] Best cost: 7168.167 | Path: [1, 5, 16, 2, 12, 4, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1, 8, 18, 22, 0, 1, 3, 19, 17, 14, 1, 9, 15, 6, 23, 21, 1] Best cost: 7165.190 | Path: [1, 2, 16, 5, 12, 4, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1, 18, 8, 22, 0, 1, 3, 19, 17, 14, 1, 9, 15, 6, 23, 21, 1] Best cost: 7149.797 | Path: [1, 2, 16, 5, 12, 4, 1, 7, 11, 13, 20, 1, 8, 18, 22, 0, 1, 3, 19, 17, 14, 1, 9, 15, 6, 23, 21, 1] Best cost: 7141.945 | Path: [1, 5, 16, 2, 12, 4, 1, 7, 11, 13, 20, 1, 8, 18, 22, 0, 1, 3, 19, 17, 14, 1, 9, 15, 6, 23, 21, 1] OPTIMIZING each tour... Current: [[1, 5, 16, 2, 12, 4, 1], [1, 7, 11, 13, 20, 1], [1, 8, 18, 22, 0, 1], [1, 3, 19, 17, 14, 1], [1, 9, 15, 6, 23, 21, 1]] [1] Cost: 1315.123 to 1312.887 | Optimized: [1, 12, 2, 16, 5, 4, 1] [2] Cost: 1190.097 to 1187.501 | Optimized: [1, 20, 13, 11, 7, 1] [3] Cost: 1270.459 to 1244.584 | Optimized: [1, 0, 22, 8, 18, 1] [4] Cost: 1410.535 to 1410.520 | Optimized: [1, 19, 17, 14, 3, 1] ACO RESULTS [1/300 vol./1312.887 km] Berlin Hbf -> Dortmund Hbf -> Düsseldorf Hbf -> Köln Hbf -> Aachen Hbf -> Hannover Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [2/300 vol./1187.501 km] Berlin Hbf -> Würzburg Hbf -> Nürnberg Hbf -> Leipzig Hbf -> Dresden Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [3/300 vol./1244.584 km] Berlin Hbf -> Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe -> Osnabrück Hbf -> Hamburg Hbf -> Kiel Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [4/285 vol./1410.520 km] Berlin Hbf -> Mainz Hbf -> Mannheim Hbf -> Karlsruhe Hbf -> Frankfurt Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [5/270 vol./1955.731 km] Berlin Hbf -> München Hbf -> Ulm Hbf -> Stuttgart Hbf -> Freiburg Hbf -> Saarbrücken Hbf --> Berlin Hbf OPTIMIZATION RESULT: 5 tours | 7111.223 km.