Solving CVRP with ACO
Minimizing Travel Cost for Complex Delivery Problems
This scenario involves the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem,
solved using the meta-heuristics algorithm Ant Colony Optimization. Basically, VRP is a network consisting of a number of nodes
(sometimes called cities) and arcs connecting one to all others along with the corresponding costs.
Mostly, the aim is to minimize the cost in visiting each customer once and only once. The term
"capacitated" is added due to some capacity constraints on the vehicles (vcap).
Enter the problem. Some company wants to deliver loads to a number of customers. In this case, we
have 24 nodes based on the location of Germany's train stations (don't ask why). The delivery
always starts from and ends at the depot, visiting a list of customers in other cities. And then
a number of questions arise:
- How do we minimize the travel cost in terms of distance?
- How many trucks are required?
- Which cities are visited by the truck #1, #2. etc.?
- depot: [0..23], def = 0
- vcap: [200..400], def = 400
There is a way to set all the demands, but I don't think you are ready for that. 😉
VCAP: 300 vol.
ACTIVE: 22 customers
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe (80 vol.)
- Düsseldorf Hbf (35 vol.)
- Frankfurt Hbf (95 vol.)
- Hannover Hbf (30 vol.)
- Aachen Hbf (35 vol.)
- Stuttgart Hbf (55 vol.)
- Dresden Hbf (45 vol.)
- Hamburg Hbf (50 vol.)
- München Hbf (70 vol.)
- Bremen Hbf (55 vol.)
- Leipzig Hbf (25 vol.)
- Dortmund Hbf (45 vol.)
- Nürnberg Hbf (65 vol.)
- Karlsruhe Hbf (90 vol.)
- Ulm Hbf (75 vol.)
- Köln Hbf (80 vol.)
- Mannheim Hbf (30 vol.)
- Kiel Hbf (80 vol.)
- Mainz Hbf (45 vol.)
- Würzburg Hbf (45 vol.)
- Osnabrück Hbf (55 vol.)
- Freiburg Hbf (75 vol.)
Tour 1
COST: 1806.388 km
LOAD: 295 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 55 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 30 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 90 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 75 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 45 vol.
Tour 2
COST: 1371.845 km
LOAD: 275 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 95 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 45 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 65 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 25 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 45 vol.
Tour 3
COST: 1113.837 km
LOAD: 270 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 30 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 55 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 55 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 50 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 80 vol.
Tour 4
COST: 1370.534 km
LOAD: 275 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 45 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 35 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 80 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 35 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 80 vol.
Tour 5
COST: 1346.514 km
LOAD: 145 vol.
- München Hbf | 70 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 75 vol.
LOAD: 295 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 55 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 30 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 90 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 75 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 45 vol.
LOAD: 275 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 95 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 45 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 65 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 25 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 45 vol.
LOAD: 270 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 30 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 55 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 55 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 50 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 80 vol.
LOAD: 275 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 45 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 35 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 80 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 35 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 80 vol.
LOAD: 145 vol.
- München Hbf | 70 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 75 vol.
#generations: 10 for global, 5 for local
#ants: 5 times #active_customers
ACO
Rel. importance of pheromones α = 1.0
Rel. importance of visibility β = 10.0
Trail persistance ρ = 0.5
Pheromone intensity Q = 10
See this wikipedia page to learn more.
NETWORK Depo: [1] Berlin Hbf | Number of cities: 24 | Total loads: 1260 vol. | Vehicle capacity: 300 vol. Loads: [80, 0, 35, 95, 30, 35, 55, 45, 50, 70, 55, 25, 45, 65, 90, 75, 80, 30, 80, 45, 45, 0, 55, 75] ITERATION Generation: #1 Best cost: 7945.707 | Path: [1, 0, 22, 10, 4, 8, 11, 1, 7, 20, 13, 15, 6, 1, 18, 12, 2, 16, 5, 1, 3, 19, 17, 14, 1, 9, 23, 1] Best cost: 7505.875 | Path: [1, 2, 16, 5, 12, 22, 4, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 19, 17, 1, 18, 8, 10, 0, 1, 6, 14, 23, 15, 1, 3, 9, 1] Best cost: 7473.735 | Path: [1, 18, 8, 10, 22, 4, 11, 1, 7, 13, 20, 3, 19, 1, 0, 12, 2, 16, 5, 1, 6, 15, 9, 14, 1, 17, 23, 1] Best cost: 7292.390 | Path: [1, 23, 14, 17, 3, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 6, 19, 1, 8, 18, 10, 4, 22, 1, 0, 12, 2, 16, 5, 1, 9, 15, 1] Best cost: 7179.147 | Path: [1, 0, 4, 10, 8, 18, 1, 11, 7, 20, 3, 19, 17, 1, 13, 6, 14, 23, 1, 22, 12, 2, 16, 5, 1, 9, 15, 1] Best cost: 7143.155 | Path: [1, 23, 14, 17, 19, 20, 1, 11, 7, 13, 9, 15, 1, 4, 22, 10, 8, 18, 1, 0, 12, 2, 16, 5, 1, 6, 3, 1] Generation: #2 Best cost: 7076.277 | Path: [1, 23, 6, 14, 17, 19, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 3, 1, 8, 18, 10, 22, 4, 1, 0, 12, 2, 16, 5, 1, 9, 15, 1] OPTIMIZING each tour... Current: [[1, 23, 6, 14, 17, 19, 1], [1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 3, 1], [1, 8, 18, 10, 22, 4, 1], [1, 0, 12, 2, 16, 5, 1], [1, 9, 15, 1]] [1] Cost: 1817.397 to 1806.388 | Optimized: [1, 6, 17, 14, 23, 19, 1] [2] Cost: 1403.375 to 1371.845 | Optimized: [1, 3, 20, 13, 11, 7, 1] [3] Cost: 1136.947 to 1113.837 | Optimized: [1, 4, 22, 10, 8, 18, 1] [4] Cost: 1372.044 to 1370.534 | Optimized: [1, 12, 2, 16, 5, 0, 1] ACO RESULTS [1/295 vol./1806.388 km] Berlin Hbf -> Stuttgart Hbf -> Mannheim Hbf -> Karlsruhe Hbf -> Freiburg Hbf -> Mainz Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [2/275 vol./1371.845 km] Berlin Hbf -> Frankfurt Hbf -> Würzburg Hbf -> Nürnberg Hbf -> Leipzig Hbf -> Dresden Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [3/270 vol./1113.837 km] Berlin Hbf -> Hannover Hbf -> Osnabrück Hbf -> Bremen Hbf -> Hamburg Hbf -> Kiel Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [4/275 vol./1370.534 km] Berlin Hbf -> Dortmund Hbf -> Düsseldorf Hbf -> Köln Hbf -> Aachen Hbf -> Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe --> Berlin Hbf [5/145 vol./1346.514 km] Berlin Hbf -> München Hbf -> Ulm Hbf --> Berlin Hbf OPTIMIZATION RESULT: 5 tours | 7009.118 km.