Solving CVRP with ACO
Minimizing Travel Cost for Complex Delivery Problems
This scenario involves the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem,
solved using the meta-heuristics algorithm Ant Colony Optimization. Basically, VRP is a network consisting of a number of nodes
(sometimes called cities) and arcs connecting one to all others along with the corresponding costs.
Mostly, the aim is to minimize the cost in visiting each customer once and only once. The term
"capacitated" is added due to some capacity constraints on the vehicles (vcap).
Enter the problem. Some company wants to deliver loads to a number of customers. In this case, we
have 24 nodes based on the location of Germany's train stations (don't ask why). The delivery
always starts from and ends at the depot, visiting a list of customers in other cities. And then
a number of questions arise:
- How do we minimize the travel cost in terms of distance?
- How many trucks are required?
- Which cities are visited by the truck #1, #2. etc.?
- depot: [0..23], def = 0
- vcap: [200..400], def = 400
There is a way to set all the demands, but I don't think you are ready for that. 😉
VCAP: 400 vol.
ACTIVE: 22 customers
- Düsseldorf Hbf (55 vol.)
- Frankfurt Hbf (90 vol.)
- Hannover Hbf (45 vol.)
- Aachen Hbf (85 vol.)
- Stuttgart Hbf (30 vol.)
- Dresden Hbf (55 vol.)
- Hamburg Hbf (75 vol.)
- München Hbf (30 vol.)
- Bremen Hbf (55 vol.)
- Leipzig Hbf (50 vol.)
- Dortmund Hbf (80 vol.)
- Nürnberg Hbf (80 vol.)
- Karlsruhe Hbf (80 vol.)
- Ulm Hbf (45 vol.)
- Köln Hbf (30 vol.)
- Mannheim Hbf (55 vol.)
- Kiel Hbf (50 vol.)
- Mainz Hbf (35 vol.)
- Würzburg Hbf (20 vol.)
- Saarbrücken Hbf (70 vol.)
- Osnabrück Hbf (75 vol.)
- Freiburg Hbf (45 vol.)
Tour 1
COST: 1184.093 km
LOAD: 375 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 20 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 80 vol.
- München Hbf | 30 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 45 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 30 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 80 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 55 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 35 vol.
Tour 2
COST: 1054.578 km
LOAD: 380 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 80 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 75 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 55 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 75 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 50 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 45 vol.
Tour 3
COST: 1272.305 km
LOAD: 375 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 90 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 45 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 70 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 85 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 30 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 55 vol.
Tour 4
COST: 758.587 km
LOAD: 105 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 55 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 50 vol.
LOAD: 375 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 20 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 80 vol.
- München Hbf | 30 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 45 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 30 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 80 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 55 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 35 vol.
LOAD: 380 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 80 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 75 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 55 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 75 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 50 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 45 vol.
LOAD: 375 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 90 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 45 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 70 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 85 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 30 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 55 vol.
LOAD: 105 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 55 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 50 vol.
#generations: 10 for global, 5 for local
#ants: 5 times #active_customers
ACO
Rel. importance of pheromones α = 1.0
Rel. importance of visibility β = 10.0
Trail persistance ρ = 0.5
Pheromone intensity Q = 10
See this wikipedia page to learn more.
NETWORK Depo: [0] Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | Number of cities: 24 | Total loads: 1235 vol. | Vehicle capacity: 400 vol. Loads: [0, 0, 55, 90, 45, 85, 30, 55, 75, 30, 55, 50, 80, 80, 80, 45, 30, 55, 50, 35, 20, 70, 75, 45] ITERATION Generation: #1 Best cost: 5753.405 | Path: [0, 2, 16, 5, 12, 22, 10, 20, 0, 4, 8, 18, 7, 11, 15, 6, 19, 0, 3, 17, 14, 21, 23, 9, 0, 13, 0] Best cost: 5140.091 | Path: [0, 3, 19, 17, 14, 6, 15, 9, 20, 0, 4, 22, 12, 2, 16, 5, 0, 11, 7, 13, 23, 21, 10, 0, 8, 18, 0] Best cost: 5113.562 | Path: [0, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 19, 3, 20, 0, 12, 2, 16, 5, 21, 23, 0, 4, 10, 8, 18, 22, 11, 0, 7, 13, 0] Best cost: 5102.380 | Path: [0, 15, 6, 14, 17, 3, 19, 20, 9, 0, 4, 10, 8, 18, 22, 12, 0, 16, 2, 5, 21, 23, 13, 0, 11, 7, 0] Best cost: 4547.057 | Path: [0, 20, 13, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 19, 0, 3, 21, 23, 5, 16, 2, 0, 12, 22, 4, 10, 8, 18, 0, 11, 7, 0] Generation: #2 Best cost: 4482.068 | Path: [0, 20, 13, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 19, 0, 22, 10, 4, 8, 18, 12, 0, 2, 16, 5, 21, 23, 3, 0, 7, 11, 0] Best cost: 4365.839 | Path: [0, 20, 13, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 19, 0, 22, 10, 8, 18, 4, 12, 0, 2, 16, 5, 21, 23, 3, 0, 11, 7, 0] Best cost: 4359.590 | Path: [0, 20, 13, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 19, 0, 4, 10, 8, 18, 22, 12, 0, 2, 16, 5, 21, 23, 3, 0, 11, 7, 0] OPTIMIZING each tour... Current: [[0, 20, 13, 9, 15, 6, 14, 17, 19, 0], [0, 4, 10, 8, 18, 22, 12, 0], [0, 2, 16, 5, 21, 23, 3, 0], [0, 11, 7, 0]] [2] Cost: 1132.002 to 1054.578 | Optimized: [0, 12, 22, 10, 8, 18, 4, 0] [3] Cost: 1281.852 to 1272.305 | Optimized: [0, 3, 23, 21, 5, 16, 2, 0] [4] Cost: 761.643 to 758.587 | Optimized: [0, 7, 11, 0] ACO RESULTS [1/375 vol./1184.093 km] Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe -> Würzburg Hbf -> Nürnberg Hbf -> München Hbf -> Ulm Hbf -> Stuttgart Hbf -> Karlsruhe Hbf -> Mannheim Hbf -> Mainz Hbf --> Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe [2/380 vol./1054.578 km] Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe -> Dortmund Hbf -> Osnabrück Hbf -> Bremen Hbf -> Hamburg Hbf -> Kiel Hbf -> Hannover Hbf --> Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe [3/375 vol./1272.305 km] Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe -> Frankfurt Hbf -> Freiburg Hbf -> Saarbrücken Hbf -> Aachen Hbf -> Köln Hbf -> Düsseldorf Hbf --> Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe [4/105 vol./ 758.587 km] Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe -> Dresden Hbf -> Leipzig Hbf --> Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe OPTIMIZATION RESULT: 4 tours | 4269.563 km.