Solving CVRP with ACO
Minimizing Travel Cost for Complex Delivery Problems
This scenario involves the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem,
solved using the meta-heuristics algorithm Ant Colony Optimization. Basically, VRP is a network consisting of a number of nodes
(sometimes called cities) and arcs connecting one to all others along with the corresponding costs.
Mostly, the aim is to minimize the cost in visiting each customer once and only once. The term
"capacitated" is added due to some capacity constraints on the vehicles (vcap).
Enter the problem. Some company wants to deliver loads to a number of customers. In this case, we
have 24 nodes based on the location of Germany's train stations (don't ask why). The delivery
always starts from and ends at the depot, visiting a list of customers in other cities. And then
a number of questions arise:
- How do we minimize the travel cost in terms of distance?
- How many trucks are required?
- Which cities are visited by the truck #1, #2. etc.?
- depot: [0..23], def = 0
- vcap: [200..400], def = 400
There is a way to set all the demands, but I don't think you are ready for that. 😉
VCAP: 300 vol.
ACTIVE: 21 customers
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe (95 vol.)
- Düsseldorf Hbf (95 vol.)
- Frankfurt Hbf (75 vol.)
- Hannover Hbf (95 vol.)
- Aachen Hbf (45 vol.)
- Stuttgart Hbf (50 vol.)
- Dresden Hbf (85 vol.)
- Hamburg Hbf (80 vol.)
- München Hbf (80 vol.)
- Bremen Hbf (75 vol.)
- Leipzig Hbf (75 vol.)
- Dortmund Hbf (30 vol.)
- Nürnberg Hbf (45 vol.)
- Karlsruhe Hbf (100 vol.)
- Köln Hbf (30 vol.)
- Kiel Hbf (65 vol.)
- Mainz Hbf (75 vol.)
- Würzburg Hbf (40 vol.)
- Saarbrücken Hbf (50 vol.)
- Osnabrück Hbf (90 vol.)
- Freiburg Hbf (95 vol.)
Tour 1
COST: 1773.711 km
LOAD: 295 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 50 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 100 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 95 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 50 vol.
Tour 2
COST: 1230.587 km
LOAD: 285 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 95 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 30 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 75 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 85 vol.
Tour 3
COST: 1595.804 km
LOAD: 295 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 45 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 30 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 75 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 80 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 65 vol.
Tour 4
COST: 1443.311 km
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 40 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 75 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 95 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 90 vol.
Tour 5
COST: 1574.559 km
LOAD: 295 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 95 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 75 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 45 vol.
- München Hbf | 80 vol.
LOAD: 295 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 50 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 100 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 95 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 50 vol.
LOAD: 285 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 95 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 30 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 75 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 85 vol.
LOAD: 295 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 45 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 30 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 75 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 80 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 65 vol.
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 40 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 75 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 95 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 90 vol.
LOAD: 295 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 95 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 75 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 45 vol.
- München Hbf | 80 vol.
#generations: 10 for global, 5 for local
#ants: 5 times #active_customers
ACO
Rel. importance of pheromones α = 1.0
Rel. importance of visibility β = 10.0
Trail persistance ρ = 0.5
Pheromone intensity Q = 10
See this wikipedia page to learn more.
NETWORK Depo: [1] Berlin Hbf | Number of cities: 24 | Total loads: 1470 vol. | Vehicle capacity: 300 vol. Loads: [95, 0, 95, 75, 95, 45, 50, 85, 80, 80, 75, 75, 30, 45, 100, 0, 30, 0, 65, 75, 40, 50, 90, 95] ITERATION Generation: #1 Best cost: 9333.105 | Path: [1, 0, 12, 2, 16, 5, 1, 7, 11, 4, 20, 1, 8, 18, 10, 3, 1, 22, 19, 21, 6, 1, 13, 9, 14, 1, 23, 1] Best cost: 8627.657 | Path: [1, 3, 19, 20, 14, 1, 11, 7, 13, 9, 1, 8, 18, 10, 12, 16, 1, 4, 22, 0, 1, 2, 5, 21, 23, 1, 6, 1] Best cost: 8626.196 | Path: [1, 13, 20, 3, 19, 21, 1, 11, 7, 0, 12, 1, 8, 18, 10, 5, 16, 1, 4, 22, 2, 1, 14, 6, 23, 1, 9, 1] Best cost: 8486.896 | Path: [1, 23, 14, 6, 13, 1, 11, 7, 20, 3, 1, 8, 18, 10, 12, 16, 1, 4, 22, 2, 1, 0, 19, 21, 5, 1, 9, 1] Best cost: 8375.153 | Path: [1, 16, 2, 5, 12, 22, 1, 7, 11, 10, 18, 1, 8, 4, 0, 1, 13, 20, 3, 19, 21, 1, 9, 6, 14, 1, 23, 1] Best cost: 8137.019 | Path: [1, 3, 19, 21, 14, 1, 11, 7, 20, 13, 6, 1, 4, 10, 22, 12, 1, 8, 18, 0, 5, 1, 9, 23, 2, 16, 1] Best cost: 8061.158 | Path: [1, 16, 2, 5, 12, 22, 1, 11, 7, 0, 20, 1, 8, 18, 10, 3, 1, 4, 23, 14, 1, 13, 6, 9, 21, 19, 1] Best cost: 7997.281 | Path: [1, 12, 2, 16, 5, 22, 1, 7, 11, 10, 18, 1, 8, 4, 0, 1, 13, 20, 3, 19, 21, 1, 6, 14, 23, 1, 9, 1] Best cost: 7758.211 | Path: [1, 2, 16, 5, 12, 22, 1, 7, 11, 0, 20, 1, 18, 8, 4, 13, 1, 3, 19, 14, 6, 1, 10, 21, 23, 9, 1] Generation: #2 Best cost: 7691.283 | Path: [1, 6, 14, 23, 21, 1, 7, 11, 4, 12, 1, 8, 18, 10, 16, 5, 1, 22, 2, 19, 20, 1, 0, 3, 13, 9, 1] OPTIMIZING each tour... Current: [[1, 6, 14, 23, 21, 1], [1, 7, 11, 4, 12, 1], [1, 8, 18, 10, 16, 5, 1], [1, 22, 2, 19, 20, 1], [1, 0, 3, 13, 9, 1]] [2] Cost: 1279.478 to 1230.587 | Optimized: [1, 4, 12, 11, 7, 1] [3] Cost: 1616.939 to 1595.804 | Optimized: [1, 5, 16, 10, 8, 18, 1] [4] Cost: 1446.596 to 1443.311 | Optimized: [1, 20, 19, 2, 22, 1] ACO RESULTS [1/295 vol./1773.711 km] Berlin Hbf -> Stuttgart Hbf -> Karlsruhe Hbf -> Freiburg Hbf -> Saarbrücken Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [2/285 vol./1230.587 km] Berlin Hbf -> Hannover Hbf -> Dortmund Hbf -> Leipzig Hbf -> Dresden Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [3/295 vol./1595.804 km] Berlin Hbf -> Aachen Hbf -> Köln Hbf -> Bremen Hbf -> Hamburg Hbf -> Kiel Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [4/300 vol./1443.311 km] Berlin Hbf -> Würzburg Hbf -> Mainz Hbf -> Düsseldorf Hbf -> Osnabrück Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [5/295 vol./1574.559 km] Berlin Hbf -> Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe -> Frankfurt Hbf -> Nürnberg Hbf -> München Hbf --> Berlin Hbf OPTIMIZATION RESULT: 5 tours | 7617.972 km.