Solving CVRP with ACO
Minimizing Travel Cost for Complex Delivery Problems
This scenario involves the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem,
solved using the meta-heuristics algorithm Ant Colony Optimization. Basically, VRP is a network consisting of a number of nodes
(sometimes called cities) and arcs connecting one to all others along with the corresponding costs.
Mostly, the aim is to minimize the cost in visiting each customer once and only once. The term
"capacitated" is added due to some capacity constraints on the vehicles (vcap).
Enter the problem. Some company wants to deliver loads to a number of customers. In this case, we
have 24 nodes based on the location of Germany's train stations (don't ask why). The delivery
always starts from and ends at the depot, visiting a list of customers in other cities. And then
a number of questions arise:
- How do we minimize the travel cost in terms of distance?
- How many trucks are required?
- Which cities are visited by the truck #1, #2. etc.?
- depot: [0..23], def = 0
- vcap: [200..400], def = 400
There is a way to set all the demands, but I don't think you are ready for that. 😉
VCAP: 300 vol.
ACTIVE: 22 customers
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe (60 vol.)
- Düsseldorf Hbf (55 vol.)
- Frankfurt Hbf (55 vol.)
- Hannover Hbf (70 vol.)
- Aachen Hbf (35 vol.)
- Stuttgart Hbf (75 vol.)
- Dresden Hbf (45 vol.)
- Hamburg Hbf (80 vol.)
- München Hbf (100 vol.)
- Bremen Hbf (60 vol.)
- Leipzig Hbf (85 vol.)
- Dortmund Hbf (65 vol.)
- Nürnberg Hbf (80 vol.)
- Karlsruhe Hbf (25 vol.)
- Ulm Hbf (35 vol.)
- Köln Hbf (35 vol.)
- Mannheim Hbf (95 vol.)
- Kiel Hbf (35 vol.)
- Mainz Hbf (95 vol.)
- Saarbrücken Hbf (35 vol.)
- Osnabrück Hbf (20 vol.)
- Freiburg Hbf (35 vol.)
Tour 1
COST: 1618.068 km
LOAD: 290 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 55 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 95 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 95 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 25 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 20 vol.
Tour 2
COST: 1007.951 km
LOAD: 280 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 45 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 85 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 70 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 80 vol.
Tour 3
COST: 1593.443 km
LOAD: 285 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 65 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 35 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 35 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 55 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 60 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 35 vol.
Tour 4
COST: 1895.727 km
LOAD: 240 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 35 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 75 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 35 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 35 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 60 vol.
Tour 5
COST: 1189.939 km
LOAD: 180 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 80 vol.
- München Hbf | 100 vol.
LOAD: 290 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 55 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 95 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 95 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 25 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 20 vol.
LOAD: 280 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 45 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 85 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 70 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 80 vol.
LOAD: 285 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 65 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 35 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 35 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 55 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 60 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 35 vol.
LOAD: 240 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 35 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 75 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 35 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 35 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 60 vol.
LOAD: 180 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 80 vol.
- München Hbf | 100 vol.
#generations: 10 for global, 5 for local
#ants: 5 times #active_customers
ACO
Rel. importance of pheromones α = 1.0
Rel. importance of visibility β = 10.0
Trail persistance ρ = 0.5
Pheromone intensity Q = 10
See this wikipedia page to learn more.
NETWORK Depo: [1] Berlin Hbf | Number of cities: 24 | Total loads: 1275 vol. | Vehicle capacity: 300 vol. Loads: [60, 0, 55, 55, 70, 35, 75, 45, 80, 100, 60, 85, 65, 80, 25, 35, 35, 95, 35, 95, 0, 35, 20, 35] ITERATION Generation: #1 Best cost: 8143.145 | Path: [1, 0, 12, 2, 16, 5, 22, 14, 1, 7, 11, 4, 10, 18, 1, 8, 17, 3, 21, 23, 1, 13, 9, 15, 6, 1, 19, 1] Best cost: 8039.028 | Path: [1, 3, 19, 17, 14, 22, 1, 11, 7, 10, 8, 1, 4, 0, 12, 2, 16, 1, 18, 5, 21, 6, 15, 13, 1, 9, 23, 1] Best cost: 7663.793 | Path: [1, 6, 15, 9, 13, 1, 7, 11, 4, 10, 22, 1, 8, 18, 0, 12, 2, 1, 19, 3, 17, 14, 1, 23, 21, 5, 16, 1] Best cost: 7545.591 | Path: [1, 9, 15, 6, 14, 23, 22, 1, 7, 11, 4, 10, 18, 1, 8, 0, 3, 19, 1, 13, 17, 21, 5, 16, 1, 12, 2, 1] Best cost: 7511.944 | Path: [1, 23, 14, 17, 3, 21, 5, 22, 1, 7, 11, 0, 4, 18, 1, 8, 10, 12, 2, 16, 1, 13, 9, 15, 6, 1, 19, 1] Best cost: 7502.777 | Path: [1, 17, 14, 6, 15, 23, 21, 1, 7, 11, 4, 10, 22, 1, 8, 18, 16, 2, 12, 1, 0, 3, 19, 5, 1, 13, 9, 1] Generation: #2 Best cost: 7500.304 | Path: [1, 12, 2, 16, 5, 21, 23, 14, 1, 11, 7, 13, 15, 3, 1, 8, 18, 10, 22, 4, 1, 0, 19, 17, 1, 9, 6, 1] Generation: #3 Best cost: 7493.638 | Path: [1, 6, 14, 17, 19, 1, 7, 11, 4, 8, 22, 1, 18, 10, 2, 16, 5, 12, 1, 0, 3, 21, 23, 15, 13, 1, 9, 1] Generation: #5 Best cost: 7347.953 | Path: [1, 19, 3, 17, 14, 22, 1, 7, 11, 4, 8, 1, 18, 10, 12, 2, 16, 5, 1, 0, 21, 23, 6, 15, 1, 13, 9, 1] OPTIMIZING each tour... Current: [[1, 19, 3, 17, 14, 22, 1], [1, 7, 11, 4, 8, 1], [1, 18, 10, 12, 2, 16, 5, 1], [1, 0, 21, 23, 6, 15, 1], [1, 13, 9, 1]] [1] Cost: 1640.494 to 1618.068 | Optimized: [1, 3, 19, 17, 14, 22, 1] [3] Cost: 1612.495 to 1593.443 | Optimized: [1, 12, 16, 5, 2, 10, 18, 1] [4] Cost: 1897.074 to 1895.727 | Optimized: [1, 15, 6, 23, 21, 0, 1] ACO RESULTS [1/290 vol./1618.068 km] Berlin Hbf -> Frankfurt Hbf -> Mainz Hbf -> Mannheim Hbf -> Karlsruhe Hbf -> Osnabrück Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [2/280 vol./1007.951 km] Berlin Hbf -> Dresden Hbf -> Leipzig Hbf -> Hannover Hbf -> Hamburg Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [3/285 vol./1593.443 km] Berlin Hbf -> Dortmund Hbf -> Köln Hbf -> Aachen Hbf -> Düsseldorf Hbf -> Bremen Hbf -> Kiel Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [4/240 vol./1895.727 km] Berlin Hbf -> Ulm Hbf -> Stuttgart Hbf -> Freiburg Hbf -> Saarbrücken Hbf -> Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe --> Berlin Hbf [5/180 vol./1189.939 km] Berlin Hbf -> Nürnberg Hbf -> München Hbf --> Berlin Hbf OPTIMIZATION RESULT: 5 tours | 7305.128 km.