Solving CVRP with ACO
Minimizing Travel Cost for Complex Delivery Problems
This scenario involves the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem,
solved using the meta-heuristics algorithm Ant Colony Optimization. Basically, VRP is a network consisting of a number of nodes
(sometimes called cities) and arcs connecting one to all others along with the corresponding costs.
Mostly, the aim is to minimize the cost in visiting each customer once and only once. The term
"capacitated" is added due to some capacity constraints on the vehicles (vcap).
Enter the problem. Some company wants to deliver loads to a number of customers. In this case, we
have 24 nodes based on the location of Germany's train stations (don't ask why). The delivery
always starts from and ends at the depot, visiting a list of customers in other cities. And then
a number of questions arise:
- How do we minimize the travel cost in terms of distance?
- How many trucks are required?
- Which cities are visited by the truck #1, #2. etc.?
- depot: [0..23], def = 0
- vcap: [200..400], def = 400
There is a way to set all the demands, but I don't think you are ready for that. 😉
VCAP: 300 vol.
ACTIVE: 22 customers
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe (25 vol.)
- Düsseldorf Hbf (85 vol.)
- Frankfurt Hbf (25 vol.)
- Hannover Hbf (100 vol.)
- Aachen Hbf (95 vol.)
- Stuttgart Hbf (80 vol.)
- Dresden Hbf (100 vol.)
- Hamburg Hbf (50 vol.)
- Bremen Hbf (25 vol.)
- Leipzig Hbf (90 vol.)
- Dortmund Hbf (65 vol.)
- Nürnberg Hbf (60 vol.)
- Karlsruhe Hbf (95 vol.)
- Ulm Hbf (95 vol.)
- Köln Hbf (50 vol.)
- Mannheim Hbf (80 vol.)
- Kiel Hbf (30 vol.)
- Mainz Hbf (25 vol.)
- Würzburg Hbf (40 vol.)
- Saarbrücken Hbf (100 vol.)
- Osnabrück Hbf (100 vol.)
- Freiburg Hbf (75 vol.)
Tour 1
COST: 1219.43 km
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 65 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 85 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 50 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 100 vol.
Tour 2
COST: 1143.007 km
LOAD: 290 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 100 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 60 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 40 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 90 vol.
Tour 3
COST: 1687.131 km
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 30 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 50 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 25 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 100 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 95 vol.
Tour 4
COST: 1674.135 km
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 25 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 25 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 80 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 95 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 75 vol.
Tour 5
COST: 1702.965 km
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 25 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 100 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 80 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 95 vol.
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 65 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 85 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 50 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 100 vol.
LOAD: 290 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 100 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 60 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 40 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 90 vol.
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 30 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 50 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 25 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 100 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 95 vol.
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 25 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 25 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 80 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 95 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 75 vol.
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 25 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 100 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 80 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 95 vol.
#generations: 10 for global, 5 for local
#ants: 5 times #active_customers
ACO
Rel. importance of pheromones α = 1.0
Rel. importance of visibility β = 10.0
Trail persistance ρ = 0.5
Pheromone intensity Q = 10
See this wikipedia page to learn more.
NETWORK Depo: [1] Berlin Hbf | Number of cities: 24 | Total loads: 1490 vol. | Vehicle capacity: 300 vol. Loads: [25, 0, 85, 25, 100, 95, 80, 100, 50, 0, 25, 90, 65, 60, 95, 95, 50, 80, 30, 25, 40, 100, 100, 75] ITERATION Generation: #1 Best cost: 9326.970 | Path: [1, 0, 4, 10, 8, 18, 12, 1, 11, 7, 3, 19, 20, 1, 13, 15, 6, 16, 1, 22, 2, 5, 1, 17, 14, 23, 1, 21, 1] Best cost: 8824.606 | Path: [1, 2, 16, 5, 12, 1, 7, 11, 13, 20, 1, 8, 18, 10, 22, 0, 3, 19, 1, 4, 17, 14, 1, 15, 6, 23, 1, 21, 1] Best cost: 8486.221 | Path: [1, 3, 19, 17, 14, 23, 1, 7, 11, 0, 12, 1, 4, 22, 10, 8, 1, 18, 16, 2, 5, 20, 1, 13, 6, 15, 1, 21, 1] Best cost: 8448.644 | Path: [1, 7, 11, 4, 1, 8, 18, 10, 22, 12, 0, 1, 16, 2, 5, 19, 3, 1, 20, 13, 15, 6, 1, 17, 14, 21, 1, 23, 1] Best cost: 8397.944 | Path: [1, 13, 20, 6, 14, 3, 1, 11, 7, 4, 1, 8, 18, 10, 22, 12, 0, 1, 16, 2, 5, 19, 1, 15, 23, 21, 1, 17, 1] Best cost: 8264.642 | Path: [1, 17, 14, 6, 20, 1, 11, 7, 4, 1, 18, 8, 10, 22, 12, 0, 1, 13, 15, 23, 19, 3, 1, 2, 16, 5, 1, 21, 1] Best cost: 8200.246 | Path: [1, 18, 8, 10, 22, 12, 0, 1, 7, 11, 4, 1, 13, 20, 6, 14, 3, 1, 2, 16, 5, 19, 1, 17, 21, 23, 1, 15, 1] Best cost: 8194.171 | Path: [1, 23, 14, 17, 19, 3, 1, 11, 7, 4, 1, 8, 18, 10, 22, 12, 0, 1, 13, 20, 6, 15, 1, 2, 16, 5, 1, 21, 1] Best cost: 8057.568 | Path: [1, 23, 14, 17, 19, 3, 1, 7, 11, 4, 1, 8, 18, 10, 22, 12, 0, 1, 20, 6, 15, 13, 1, 16, 2, 5, 1, 21, 1] Best cost: 7711.911 | Path: [1, 2, 16, 12, 22, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1, 8, 18, 10, 4, 5, 1, 19, 3, 17, 14, 23, 1, 0, 6, 15, 21, 1] OPTIMIZING each tour... Current: [[1, 2, 16, 12, 22, 1], [1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1], [1, 8, 18, 10, 4, 5, 1], [1, 19, 3, 17, 14, 23, 1], [1, 0, 6, 15, 21, 1]] [1] Cost: 1233.128 to 1219.430 | Optimized: [1, 12, 2, 16, 22, 1] [2] Cost: 1216.319 to 1143.007 | Optimized: [1, 7, 13, 20, 11, 1] [3] Cost: 1697.960 to 1687.131 | Optimized: [1, 18, 8, 10, 4, 5, 1] [4] Cost: 1696.561 to 1674.135 | Optimized: [1, 3, 19, 17, 14, 23, 1] [5] Cost: 1867.943 to 1702.965 | Optimized: [1, 0, 21, 6, 15, 1] ACO RESULTS [1/300 vol./1219.430 km] Berlin Hbf -> Dortmund Hbf -> Düsseldorf Hbf -> Köln Hbf -> Osnabrück Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [2/290 vol./1143.007 km] Berlin Hbf -> Dresden Hbf -> Nürnberg Hbf -> Würzburg Hbf -> Leipzig Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [3/300 vol./1687.131 km] Berlin Hbf -> Kiel Hbf -> Hamburg Hbf -> Bremen Hbf -> Hannover Hbf -> Aachen Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [4/300 vol./1674.135 km] Berlin Hbf -> Frankfurt Hbf -> Mainz Hbf -> Mannheim Hbf -> Karlsruhe Hbf -> Freiburg Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [5/300 vol./1702.965 km] Berlin Hbf -> Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe -> Saarbrücken Hbf -> Stuttgart Hbf -> Ulm Hbf --> Berlin Hbf OPTIMIZATION RESULT: 5 tours | 7426.668 km.