Solving CVRP with ACO
Minimizing Travel Cost for Complex Delivery Problems
This scenario involves the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem,
solved using the meta-heuristics algorithm Ant Colony Optimization. Basically, VRP is a network consisting of a number of nodes
(sometimes called cities) and arcs connecting one to all others along with the corresponding costs.
Mostly, the aim is to minimize the cost in visiting each customer once and only once. The term
"capacitated" is added due to some capacity constraints on the vehicles (vcap).
Enter the problem. Some company wants to deliver loads to a number of customers. In this case, we
have 24 nodes based on the location of Germany's train stations (don't ask why). The delivery
always starts from and ends at the depot, visiting a list of customers in other cities. And then
a number of questions arise:
- How do we minimize the travel cost in terms of distance?
- How many trucks are required?
- Which cities are visited by the truck #1, #2. etc.?
- depot: [0..23], def = 0
- vcap: [200..400], def = 400
There is a way to set all the demands, but I don't think you are ready for that. 😉
VCAP: 300 vol.
ACTIVE: 21 customers
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe (65 vol.)
- Frankfurt Hbf (80 vol.)
- Hannover Hbf (75 vol.)
- Aachen Hbf (45 vol.)
- Stuttgart Hbf (65 vol.)
- Dresden Hbf (85 vol.)
- Hamburg Hbf (40 vol.)
- München Hbf (90 vol.)
- Bremen Hbf (85 vol.)
- Leipzig Hbf (70 vol.)
- Dortmund Hbf (20 vol.)
- Nürnberg Hbf (100 vol.)
- Ulm Hbf (100 vol.)
- Köln Hbf (85 vol.)
- Mannheim Hbf (45 vol.)
- Kiel Hbf (25 vol.)
- Mainz Hbf (100 vol.)
- Würzburg Hbf (80 vol.)
- Saarbrücken Hbf (45 vol.)
- Osnabrück Hbf (30 vol.)
- Freiburg Hbf (40 vol.)
Tour 1
COST: 1606.526 km
LOAD: 290 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 20 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 85 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 45 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 30 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 85 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 25 vol.
Tour 2
COST: 1007.951 km
LOAD: 270 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 85 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 70 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 75 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 40 vol.
Tour 3
COST: 1345.202 km
LOAD: 270 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 80 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 100 vol.
- München Hbf | 90 vol.
Tour 4
COST: 1336.583 km
LOAD: 290 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 45 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 100 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 80 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 65 vol.
Tour 5
COST: 1849.647 km
LOAD: 250 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 100 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 65 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 40 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 45 vol.
LOAD: 290 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 20 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 85 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 45 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 30 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 85 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 25 vol.
LOAD: 270 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 85 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 70 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 75 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 40 vol.
LOAD: 270 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 80 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 100 vol.
- München Hbf | 90 vol.
LOAD: 290 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 45 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 100 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 80 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 65 vol.
LOAD: 250 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 100 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 65 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 40 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 45 vol.
#generations: 10 for global, 5 for local
#ants: 5 times #active_customers
ACO
Rel. importance of pheromones α = 1.0
Rel. importance of visibility β = 10.0
Trail persistance ρ = 0.5
Pheromone intensity Q = 10
See this wikipedia page to learn more.
NETWORK Depo: [1] Berlin Hbf | Number of cities: 24 | Total loads: 1370 vol. | Vehicle capacity: 300 vol. Loads: [65, 0, 0, 80, 75, 45, 65, 85, 40, 90, 85, 70, 20, 100, 0, 100, 85, 45, 25, 100, 80, 45, 30, 40] ITERATION Generation: #1 Best cost: 8296.701 | Path: [1, 0, 12, 16, 5, 22, 8, 1, 7, 11, 13, 17, 1, 4, 10, 18, 3, 1, 6, 15, 9, 23, 1, 20, 19, 21, 1] Best cost: 8170.982 | Path: [1, 4, 8, 18, 10, 22, 12, 1, 7, 11, 9, 17, 1, 0, 3, 19, 21, 1, 13, 20, 6, 23, 1, 16, 5, 15, 1] Best cost: 8077.397 | Path: [1, 6, 15, 9, 17, 1, 11, 7, 0, 3, 1, 8, 18, 10, 4, 22, 12, 1, 20, 13, 19, 1, 16, 5, 21, 23, 1] Best cost: 7800.434 | Path: [1, 9, 15, 6, 17, 1, 11, 7, 4, 22, 12, 1, 0, 3, 19, 21, 1, 8, 18, 10, 16, 5, 1, 13, 20, 23, 1] Best cost: 7789.224 | Path: [1, 15, 6, 17, 3, 1, 7, 11, 0, 12, 22, 18, 1, 8, 10, 4, 16, 1, 20, 13, 9, 1, 19, 21, 23, 5, 1] Best cost: 7587.443 | Path: [1, 18, 8, 10, 4, 22, 12, 1, 7, 11, 20, 6, 1, 0, 19, 3, 17, 1, 13, 9, 15, 1, 5, 16, 21, 23, 1] Best cost: 7522.419 | Path: [1, 0, 12, 22, 10, 8, 18, 1, 11, 7, 20, 6, 1, 4, 16, 5, 21, 17, 1, 13, 9, 15, 1, 3, 19, 23, 1] Best cost: 7494.569 | Path: [1, 7, 11, 0, 20, 1, 8, 18, 10, 22, 12, 16, 1, 4, 5, 19, 3, 1, 13, 9, 15, 1, 17, 23, 21, 6, 1] Best cost: 7362.231 | Path: [1, 16, 5, 12, 22, 10, 18, 1, 7, 11, 4, 8, 1, 9, 15, 6, 17, 1, 0, 3, 19, 21, 1, 13, 20, 23, 1] Best cost: 7354.581 | Path: [1, 12, 16, 5, 21, 17, 23, 1, 11, 7, 20, 6, 1, 8, 18, 10, 4, 22, 1, 13, 9, 15, 1, 0, 3, 19, 1] Best cost: 7164.085 | Path: [1, 7, 11, 4, 8, 18, 1, 10, 22, 12, 16, 5, 1, 20, 13, 9, 1, 0, 3, 19, 17, 1, 15, 6, 23, 21, 1] Generation: #2 Best cost: 7150.272 | Path: [1, 5, 16, 12, 22, 10, 18, 1, 7, 11, 4, 8, 1, 20, 13, 9, 1, 0, 3, 19, 17, 1, 15, 6, 23, 21, 1] OPTIMIZING each tour... Current: [[1, 5, 16, 12, 22, 10, 18, 1], [1, 7, 11, 4, 8, 1], [1, 20, 13, 9, 1], [1, 0, 3, 19, 17, 1], [1, 15, 6, 23, 21, 1]] [1] Cost: 1609.264 to 1606.526 | Optimized: [1, 12, 16, 5, 22, 10, 18, 1] [4] Cost: 1338.208 to 1336.583 | Optimized: [1, 17, 19, 3, 0, 1] ACO RESULTS [1/290 vol./1606.526 km] Berlin Hbf -> Dortmund Hbf -> Köln Hbf -> Aachen Hbf -> Osnabrück Hbf -> Bremen Hbf -> Kiel Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [2/270 vol./1007.951 km] Berlin Hbf -> Dresden Hbf -> Leipzig Hbf -> Hannover Hbf -> Hamburg Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [3/270 vol./1345.202 km] Berlin Hbf -> Würzburg Hbf -> Nürnberg Hbf -> München Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [4/290 vol./1336.583 km] Berlin Hbf -> Mannheim Hbf -> Mainz Hbf -> Frankfurt Hbf -> Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe --> Berlin Hbf [5/250 vol./1849.647 km] Berlin Hbf -> Ulm Hbf -> Stuttgart Hbf -> Freiburg Hbf -> Saarbrücken Hbf --> Berlin Hbf OPTIMIZATION RESULT: 5 tours | 7145.909 km.