Solving CVRP with ACO
Minimizing Travel Cost for Complex Delivery Problems
This scenario involves the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem,
solved using the meta-heuristics algorithm Ant Colony Optimization. Basically, VRP is a network consisting of a number of nodes
(sometimes called cities) and arcs connecting one to all others along with the corresponding costs.
Mostly, the aim is to minimize the cost in visiting each customer once and only once. The term
"capacitated" is added due to some capacity constraints on the vehicles (vcap).
Enter the problem. Some company wants to deliver loads to a number of customers. In this case, we
have 24 nodes based on the location of Germany's train stations (don't ask why). The delivery
always starts from and ends at the depot, visiting a list of customers in other cities. And then
a number of questions arise:
- How do we minimize the travel cost in terms of distance?
- How many trucks are required?
- Which cities are visited by the truck #1, #2. etc.?
- depot: [0..23], def = 0
- vcap: [200..400], def = 400
There is a way to set all the demands, but I don't think you are ready for that. 😉
VCAP: 300 vol.
ACTIVE: 21 customers
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe (85 vol.)
- Düsseldorf Hbf (85 vol.)
- Frankfurt Hbf (85 vol.)
- Hannover Hbf (100 vol.)
- Aachen Hbf (95 vol.)
- Stuttgart Hbf (70 vol.)
- Dresden Hbf (85 vol.)
- Hamburg Hbf (85 vol.)
- München Hbf (35 vol.)
- Leipzig Hbf (20 vol.)
- Dortmund Hbf (65 vol.)
- Nürnberg Hbf (80 vol.)
- Karlsruhe Hbf (85 vol.)
- Ulm Hbf (70 vol.)
- Köln Hbf (25 vol.)
- Mannheim Hbf (80 vol.)
- Kiel Hbf (95 vol.)
- Würzburg Hbf (90 vol.)
- Saarbrücken Hbf (30 vol.)
- Osnabrück Hbf (85 vol.)
- Freiburg Hbf (75 vol.)
Tour 1
COST: 1856.1 km
LOAD: 295 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 80 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 85 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 75 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 30 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 25 vol.
Tour 2
COST: 1187.501 km
LOAD: 275 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 90 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 80 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 20 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 85 vol.
Tour 3
COST: 881.934 km
LOAD: 280 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 100 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 85 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 95 vol.
Tour 4
COST: 1570.276 km
LOAD: 260 vol.
- München Hbf | 35 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 70 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 70 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 85 vol.
Tour 5
COST: 1175.326 km
LOAD: 235 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 65 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 85 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 85 vol.
Tour 6
COST: 1316.083 km
LOAD: 180 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 95 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 85 vol.
LOAD: 295 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 80 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 85 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 75 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 30 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 25 vol.
LOAD: 275 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 90 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 80 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 20 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 85 vol.
LOAD: 280 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 100 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 85 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 95 vol.
LOAD: 260 vol.
- München Hbf | 35 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 70 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 70 vol.
- Frankfurt Hbf | 85 vol.
LOAD: 235 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 65 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 85 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 85 vol.
LOAD: 180 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 95 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 85 vol.
#generations: 10 for global, 5 for local
#ants: 5 times #active_customers
ACO
Rel. importance of pheromones α = 1.0
Rel. importance of visibility β = 10.0
Trail persistance ρ = 0.5
Pheromone intensity Q = 10
See this wikipedia page to learn more.
NETWORK Depo: [1] Berlin Hbf | Number of cities: 24 | Total loads: 1525 vol. | Vehicle capacity: 300 vol. Loads: [85, 0, 85, 85, 100, 95, 70, 85, 85, 35, 0, 20, 65, 80, 85, 70, 25, 80, 95, 0, 90, 30, 85, 75] ITERATION Generation: #1 Best cost: 9081.862 | Path: [1, 0, 22, 4, 11, 1, 7, 13, 20, 9, 1, 8, 18, 12, 16, 21, 1, 2, 5, 3, 1, 17, 14, 6, 1, 15, 23, 1] Best cost: 8817.846 | Path: [1, 8, 18, 4, 11, 1, 7, 13, 20, 9, 1, 0, 12, 2, 16, 21, 1, 22, 5, 3, 1, 6, 14, 17, 1, 15, 23, 1] Best cost: 8579.351 | Path: [1, 9, 15, 6, 14, 21, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 16, 1, 8, 18, 4, 1, 0, 12, 2, 1, 22, 5, 3, 1, 17, 23, 1] Best cost: 8544.827 | Path: [1, 21, 17, 14, 6, 9, 1, 7, 11, 0, 4, 1, 8, 18, 22, 16, 1, 13, 20, 3, 1, 12, 2, 5, 1, 15, 23, 1] Best cost: 8242.881 | Path: [1, 6, 14, 17, 21, 16, 1, 7, 11, 0, 22, 1, 8, 18, 4, 1, 20, 13, 9, 15, 1, 5, 2, 12, 1, 3, 23, 1] Best cost: 8209.442 | Path: [1, 20, 6, 14, 21, 16, 1, 11, 7, 13, 9, 15, 1, 18, 8, 4, 1, 0, 22, 12, 1, 3, 17, 23, 1, 5, 2, 1] Best cost: 8199.377 | Path: [1, 6, 14, 17, 21, 16, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1, 8, 18, 4, 1, 9, 15, 23, 3, 1, 0, 12, 2, 1, 22, 5, 1] Generation: #3 Best cost: 8187.942 | Path: [1, 23, 14, 17, 21, 16, 1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1, 8, 18, 4, 1, 3, 6, 15, 9, 1, 0, 12, 2, 1, 22, 5, 1] OPTIMIZING each tour... Current: [[1, 23, 14, 17, 21, 16, 1], [1, 11, 7, 13, 20, 1], [1, 8, 18, 4, 1], [1, 3, 6, 15, 9, 1], [1, 0, 12, 2, 1], [1, 22, 5, 1]] [1] Cost: 1972.004 to 1856.100 | Optimized: [1, 17, 14, 23, 21, 16, 1] [2] Cost: 1216.319 to 1187.501 | Optimized: [1, 20, 13, 11, 7, 1] [3] Cost: 915.093 to 881.934 | Optimized: [1, 4, 8, 18, 1] [4] Cost: 1585.012 to 1570.276 | Optimized: [1, 9, 15, 6, 3, 1] [5] Cost: 1176.836 to 1175.326 | Optimized: [1, 12, 2, 0, 1] [6] Cost: 1322.678 to 1316.083 | Optimized: [1, 5, 22, 1] ACO RESULTS [1/295 vol./1856.100 km] Berlin Hbf -> Mannheim Hbf -> Karlsruhe Hbf -> Freiburg Hbf -> Saarbrücken Hbf -> Köln Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [2/275 vol./1187.501 km] Berlin Hbf -> Würzburg Hbf -> Nürnberg Hbf -> Leipzig Hbf -> Dresden Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [3/280 vol./ 881.934 km] Berlin Hbf -> Hannover Hbf -> Hamburg Hbf -> Kiel Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [4/260 vol./1570.276 km] Berlin Hbf -> München Hbf -> Ulm Hbf -> Stuttgart Hbf -> Frankfurt Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [5/235 vol./1175.326 km] Berlin Hbf -> Dortmund Hbf -> Düsseldorf Hbf -> Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe --> Berlin Hbf [6/180 vol./1316.083 km] Berlin Hbf -> Aachen Hbf -> Osnabrück Hbf --> Berlin Hbf OPTIMIZATION RESULT: 6 tours | 7987.220 km.