Solving CVRP with ACO
Minimizing Travel Cost for Complex Delivery Problems
This scenario involves the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem,
solved using the meta-heuristics algorithm Ant Colony Optimization. Basically, VRP is a network consisting of a number of nodes
(sometimes called cities) and arcs connecting one to all others along with the corresponding costs.
Mostly, the aim is to minimize the cost in visiting each customer once and only once. The term
"capacitated" is added due to some capacity constraints on the vehicles (vcap).
Enter the problem. Some company wants to deliver loads to a number of customers. In this case, we
have 24 nodes based on the location of Germany's train stations (don't ask why). The delivery
always starts from and ends at the depot, visiting a list of customers in other cities. And then
a number of questions arise:
- How do we minimize the travel cost in terms of distance?
- How many trucks are required?
- Which cities are visited by the truck #1, #2. etc.?
- depot: [0..23], def = 0
- vcap: [200..400], def = 400
There is a way to set all the demands, but I don't think you are ready for that. 😉
VCAP: 300 vol.
ACTIVE: 22 customers
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe (85 vol.)
- Düsseldorf Hbf (90 vol.)
- Hannover Hbf (35 vol.)
- Aachen Hbf (35 vol.)
- Stuttgart Hbf (50 vol.)
- Dresden Hbf (85 vol.)
- Hamburg Hbf (45 vol.)
- München Hbf (100 vol.)
- Bremen Hbf (25 vol.)
- Leipzig Hbf (30 vol.)
- Dortmund Hbf (40 vol.)
- Nürnberg Hbf (85 vol.)
- Karlsruhe Hbf (55 vol.)
- Ulm Hbf (100 vol.)
- Köln Hbf (85 vol.)
- Mannheim Hbf (50 vol.)
- Kiel Hbf (100 vol.)
- Mainz Hbf (85 vol.)
- Würzburg Hbf (20 vol.)
- Saarbrücken Hbf (80 vol.)
- Osnabrück Hbf (65 vol.)
- Freiburg Hbf (70 vol.)
Tour 1
COST: 1463.959 km
LOAD: 290 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 85 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 50 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 55 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 50 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 20 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 30 vol.
Tour 2
COST: 1350.77 km
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 40 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 90 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 85 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 85 vol.
Tour 3
COST: 1113.837 km
LOAD: 270 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 35 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 65 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 25 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 45 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 100 vol.
Tour 4
COST: 1357.805 km
LOAD: 285 vol.
- München Hbf | 100 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 100 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 85 vol.
Tour 5
COST: 1921.042 km
LOAD: 270 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 70 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 80 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 35 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 85 vol.
LOAD: 290 vol.
- Mainz Hbf | 85 vol.
- Mannheim Hbf | 50 vol.
- Karlsruhe Hbf | 55 vol.
- Stuttgart Hbf | 50 vol.
- Würzburg Hbf | 20 vol.
- Leipzig Hbf | 30 vol.
LOAD: 300 vol.
- Dortmund Hbf | 40 vol.
- Düsseldorf Hbf | 90 vol.
- Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe | 85 vol.
- Dresden Hbf | 85 vol.
LOAD: 270 vol.
- Hannover Hbf | 35 vol.
- Osnabrück Hbf | 65 vol.
- Bremen Hbf | 25 vol.
- Hamburg Hbf | 45 vol.
- Kiel Hbf | 100 vol.
LOAD: 285 vol.
- München Hbf | 100 vol.
- Ulm Hbf | 100 vol.
- Nürnberg Hbf | 85 vol.
LOAD: 270 vol.
- Freiburg Hbf | 70 vol.
- Saarbrücken Hbf | 80 vol.
- Aachen Hbf | 35 vol.
- Köln Hbf | 85 vol.
#generations: 10 for global, 5 for local
#ants: 5 times #active_customers
ACO
Rel. importance of pheromones α = 1.0
Rel. importance of visibility β = 10.0
Trail persistance ρ = 0.5
Pheromone intensity Q = 10
See this wikipedia page to learn more.
NETWORK Depo: [1] Berlin Hbf | Number of cities: 24 | Total loads: 1415 vol. | Vehicle capacity: 300 vol. Loads: [85, 0, 90, 0, 35, 35, 50, 85, 45, 100, 25, 30, 40, 85, 55, 100, 85, 50, 100, 85, 20, 80, 65, 70] ITERATION Generation: #1 Best cost: 8088.170 | Path: [1, 0, 4, 8, 18, 10, 1, 7, 11, 13, 20, 17, 1, 22, 12, 2, 16, 1, 15, 6, 14, 23, 1, 19, 21, 5, 9, 1] Best cost: 7845.861 | Path: [1, 5, 16, 2, 12, 8, 1, 11, 7, 0, 22, 10, 1, 4, 18, 19, 17, 20, 1, 13, 9, 15, 1, 6, 14, 23, 21, 1] Best cost: 7799.090 | Path: [1, 15, 6, 14, 17, 20, 10, 1, 7, 11, 4, 8, 18, 1, 0, 12, 2, 16, 1, 22, 5, 21, 19, 1, 13, 9, 23, 1] Best cost: 7704.947 | Path: [1, 19, 17, 14, 6, 20, 12, 1, 11, 7, 13, 9, 1, 4, 10, 8, 18, 22, 1, 0, 2, 16, 5, 1, 15, 23, 21, 1] Best cost: 7575.336 | Path: [1, 23, 14, 6, 15, 20, 1, 11, 7, 13, 9, 1, 4, 10, 8, 18, 22, 1, 0, 12, 2, 16, 1, 5, 19, 17, 21, 1] Best cost: 7280.854 | Path: [1, 19, 17, 14, 6, 20, 11, 1, 7, 0, 12, 2, 1, 4, 22, 10, 8, 18, 1, 13, 9, 15, 1, 5, 16, 21, 23, 1] Generation: #3 Best cost: 7240.624 | Path: [1, 19, 17, 14, 6, 20, 11, 1, 8, 18, 10, 4, 22, 1, 7, 13, 9, 1, 0, 12, 2, 16, 1, 5, 21, 23, 15, 1] Generation: #4 Best cost: 7220.205 | Path: [1, 19, 17, 14, 6, 20, 11, 1, 7, 0, 12, 2, 1, 4, 22, 10, 8, 18, 1, 13, 9, 15, 1, 16, 5, 21, 23, 1] OPTIMIZING each tour... Current: [[1, 19, 17, 14, 6, 20, 11, 1], [1, 7, 0, 12, 2, 1], [1, 4, 22, 10, 8, 18, 1], [1, 13, 9, 15, 1], [1, 16, 5, 21, 23, 1]] [2] Cost: 1353.980 to 1350.770 | Optimized: [1, 12, 2, 0, 7, 1] [4] Cost: 1366.321 to 1357.805 | Optimized: [1, 9, 15, 13, 1] [5] Cost: 1922.108 to 1921.042 | Optimized: [1, 23, 21, 5, 16, 1] ACO RESULTS [1/290 vol./1463.959 km] Berlin Hbf -> Mainz Hbf -> Mannheim Hbf -> Karlsruhe Hbf -> Stuttgart Hbf -> Würzburg Hbf -> Leipzig Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [2/300 vol./1350.770 km] Berlin Hbf -> Dortmund Hbf -> Düsseldorf Hbf -> Kassel-Wilhelmshöhe -> Dresden Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [3/270 vol./1113.837 km] Berlin Hbf -> Hannover Hbf -> Osnabrück Hbf -> Bremen Hbf -> Hamburg Hbf -> Kiel Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [4/285 vol./1357.805 km] Berlin Hbf -> München Hbf -> Ulm Hbf -> Nürnberg Hbf --> Berlin Hbf [5/270 vol./1921.042 km] Berlin Hbf -> Freiburg Hbf -> Saarbrücken Hbf -> Aachen Hbf -> Köln Hbf --> Berlin Hbf OPTIMIZATION RESULT: 5 tours | 7207.413 km.